User talk:Leilaninoelle/sandbox

Wikipedia Evaluation

-Articles: credibility • I couldn't notices if it was biased or not but if it was they didn't note that. • They do uses references and they cite each one • there wasn't really a conversation held but someone did comment suggesting a change or edit with evidence • the article was on 4 Wikiprojects it was also rated with high importance in each Wikiproject

-Essay: The Earth is Flat? Check Wikipedia • When you click on the essay it takes you to a different cite. So I didn't realize that its not directly on Wikipedia. • the essay seems kinda formatted or similar to how articles look on Wikipedia

-Polices and guidelines: Neutral point of view • If I had to summarize this going off of the "This article in a nutshell" The article about Neutral point of view is explaining that articles should be neutral in the sense that one shouldn't be bias towards one side and should be fair to each side. • Nothing about this rule or guideline really surprised me because I completely agree. Since people are just writing articles and giving people information about certain subjects they shouldn't be biased at all the need to be neutral and fair to the subject to the best of their ability

Article evaluation

First Article: Helianthus(sunflowers) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helianthus_annuus • there are a lot of confusing words in a row that I have to continue to even understand the sentence • decent in length • nice that they added pictures • I learned some things from the Article • not that much information on the topic • though in the talk page redirected me to a much better article • the second article is much better very detailed and has a good about of information and references.

Second Article: tattoo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tattoo • lots of information • very helpful that it has a contents • a few good questions in the talk page • a good amount of references • surprisingly neutral — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leilaninoelle (talk • contribs) 15:39, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Work Cited

http://www.active.com/fitness/articles/what-is-doga-875470 http://pawcurious.com/2011/01/doga-pawcurious-style/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leilaninoelle (talk • contribs) 15:40, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]