User talk:Lehightrails

Lehightrails, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Lehightrails! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Trexler Nature Preserve was accepted

Trexler Nature Preserve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LionMans Account (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Trexler Nature Preserve

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Trexler Nature Preserve you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peripitus -- Peripitus (talk) 10:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Trexler Nature Preserve

The article Trexler Nature Preserve you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Trexler Nature Preserve for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peripitus -- Peripitus (talk) 10:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lehightrails, thank you for the interesting article. Hopefully my review makes sense. I'll keep watch on the review page in case you disagree/have questions etc. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't regard the 7 days as a deadline. A finished article is more important - Peripitus (Talk) 08:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wondering if you could say when you expected to be able to get back to this article ? - Peripitus (Talk) 11:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the delay, some end of term stuff to do. I made some changes which i think address about 90% of your concerns. Please let me know what you think. Thanks.

I've gone through this and left some comments at Talk:Trexler Nature Preserve/GA1 regarding references and the structure/material in the lead - Peripitus (Talk) 07:56, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Trexler Nature Preserve

The article Trexler Nature Preserve you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Trexler Nature Preserve for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peripitus -- Peripitus (talk) 10:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]