User talk:LegoJoker68

Welcome!

Hello, LegoJoker68, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Famous Youtube Video Owners, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ttonyb1 (talk) 23:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Famous Youtube Video Owners

A tag has been placed on Famous Youtube Video Owners requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 23:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Stuart Sutcliffe. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 02:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because no member of The Beatles is/was also a member of The Rolling Stones, your revision to The Beatles article has been reverted. Steelbeard1 (talk) 10:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beatlemania Forever!

A tag has been placed on Beatlemania Forever! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 06:47, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The E-Types

A tag has been placed on The E-Types requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. E Wing (talk) 07:00, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Monkeyandapple

A tag has been placed on Monkeyandapple requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Jarry1250 ^{[ In the UK? Sign the petition! ]} 10:05, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Wizard Of Oz (2012 Film)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Wizard Of Oz (2012 Film), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Harry the Dog WOOF 12:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Wizard Of Oz (2012 Film)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Wizard Of Oz (2012 Film), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Harry the Dog WOOF 12:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Twits (2012 Film)

The article The Twits (2012 Film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CRYSTAL, does have IMDb page, but nothing else.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Twits (2012 Film)

I have nominated The Twits (2012 Film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Twits (2012 Film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:44, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Please stop adding inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. If this continues, you will be blocked from editing. Harry the Dog WOOF 12:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wizard of Oz

All the pages you have created have been deleted. Please reflect on this. This article was not deleted "for no reason". It contravened Wikipedia policies concerning creating articles on films that are not yet in production. Please read and understand the future films policy. Specifically, films that have not yet begun principal shooting should not have their own articles. Harry the Dog WOOF 08:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Untitled Batman Project (2012)

The article Untitled Batman Project (2012) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too early. There is no info that is not already covered in The Dark Knight.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PrincessofLlyr ^{royal court} 00:49, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, LegoJoker68. You have new messages at Talk:Untitled Batman Project (2012).
Message added 18:15, 4 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Final Destination 5 (2011 film)

The article Final Destination 5 (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pre-production film. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 05:17, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Final Destination 5 (2011 film)

I have nominated Final Destination 5 (2011 film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Destination 5 (2011 film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fbifriday (talk) 05:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Contagion (2011 film)

The article Contagion (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTFILM as it is a future project that has not yet commenced principal photography.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fbifriday (talk) 05:44, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sherlock Holmes 2 (film)

The article Sherlock Holmes 2 (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTFILM, as principle photography has not yet begun.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fbifriday (talk) 05:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn (2011)

The article The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn (2011) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTFILM, principal photography has not yet begun.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fbifriday (talk) 05:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -FASTILY ^{Happy 4th of July!!!} 05:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sherlock Holmes 2 (film)

I have nominated Sherlock Holmes 2 (film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherlock Holmes 2 (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fbifriday (talk) 06:46, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Contagion (2011 film)

I have nominated Contagion (2011 film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contagion (2011 film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fbifriday (talk) 06:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Child's Play (reboot)

The article Child's Play (reboot) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NOTFILM, as production has not begun.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fbifriday (talk) 07:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hanna (2011 film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hanna (2011 film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://saoirseronanfan.com/?cat=29. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hanna (2011 film)

A tag has been placed on Hanna (2011 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jimmy Pitt (talk) 08:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Hanna (2011 film)

I have nominated Hanna (2011 film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanna (2011 film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fbifriday (talk) 08:54, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summaries

Please do not copy plot summaries from sources. It's against our copyright policy, and persistent violators of that policy will be blocked from editing. Thanks, Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 week, for persistent copyright violations and introducing inappropriate articles after warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:40, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LegoJoker68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done something wrong, but I was not aware of it, so please unblock me

Decline reason:

"Not aware of it"?? Are you kidding? There's a dozen notifications above advising exactly what you have done. That's what your usertalk page - and that honkin' orange banner are for. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I fixed the template for you, but I'll leave the block to be reviewed by another administrator. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LegoJoker68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I deserve one more chance, because I know how many people read and love Wikipedia and how much they would want to read my articles, so please, consider this, and if not, I suppose it'll be one week without making an interesting article for me

Decline reason:

You do get one more chance, when this block expires. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.