User talk:Legitimateuserqa

Hello, Legitimateuserqa, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Gaganam has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://mooncinema.blogspot.com/2011/01/shana-khan-in-telugu-film-gaganams.html. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Padmalakshmisx (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—SpacemanSpiff 19:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot understand this message and block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Legitimateuserqa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new to wikipedia, I am not a sock puppet and i do not know what it is - I started editing with a user name provided by wiki administrator, I have a legitimate work email address provided to administrator . I have no idea what that earlier user name was. please unblock me

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser confirmed sock. Please email the Arbitration Committee if you wish to request unblocking. Simply creating more accounts will not aid your situation. TN X Man 10:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

dear spacemanspiff

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Legitimateuserqa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This sockpuppet block is no longer necessary, I will edit wikipedia pages from now on keeping the IP address -121.247.113.58 open. I request your kind self to take my apologies and allow me to edit - I understand wikipedia regulations

Decline reason:

If you edit in violation of your ban, even via an IP address, will result in the IP address being blocked. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 09:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.............

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Legitimateuserqa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please for gods sake help me to edit the article named Gaganam 2011 film - please - other mediocre editors are spoiling wikipedia standards in that article,please change the introduction of gaganam 2011 film article according to payanam article or allow me to edit

Decline reason:

We do not unblock because an article may need to blocked persons contributions; someone else can fix any issues with the article. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 09:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bollyjeff using offensive language on me in Spacemanspiff talk page

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Legitimateuserqa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the usernam legitimateuserqa was created by taking the help of a wiki official, with a issued work related account email,just because some user named bollyjeff(this foolish fellow bollyjeff feels that legitimateuserqa is a sockpuppett and was used for destructive editing and accuses me about this situation to spacemenspiff who blocked me). this bollyjeff abuses me with offensive language in hindi (saying pagal) so there is no individual expertise to check who did nonconstructive edits to these wikipedia administartors??? they get carried away if some other like bollyjeff who involves in edit conflicts with me, blames me as a sock puppetry, this administrator spacemanspiff will blindly believe???the problem with u admisnistartors is u guys blindly believe the bad guys and not the good editors like me- what is unconstructive in the edits done by legeitimateuserqa??? If in future in april i do wdits with open IP address,then again bollyjeff( who abuses me with bad words in hindi like pagal hai??) says this IP is sockpuppet this blind administrator Soacemanspiff will blindly believe?????

Decline reason:

Please stop blaming the administrators. In your case, the administrators are basing their decision on the assessment of the checkuser, and the obvious similarity in edits. Please see WP:STANDARD if you wish to edit Wikipedia again in six months time; in the mean time I recommend you familiarise yourself with Wikipedia policies so that you dont have the same problems next time. Also, if English is not your first language, you can edit Wikipedia in other languages. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 09:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.