User talk:LegalSmeagolian/Archives/2024/April

Comment

What made you think that posting "'relatively brief' - is not the case, article is potentially overly detailed. Additionally just because you liked a film does not mean the article meets the FA criteria." was an appropriate comment to put as the opening of my nomination? You literally haven't even read it according to your comment. You have a featured article nomination up as we speak, do you think it would be appropriate if someone had made such a dismissive drive-by comment on yours? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 20:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

What do you mean I haven't read it? I have read it, but some could argue that it is overly detailed. Apologies as potentially is likely not the right word. And yes that is fine, I don't think my comment was an issue. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 21:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

J. K. Rowling

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

Please have a look also at the information at this page, which appears every time you edit J. K. Rowling. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Challenger 2 Tank Firing a Shell

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Challenger 2 Tank Firing a Shell MOD 45157421.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 06:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Simon Ekpa

Hi Mentor, I wish to know how Wikipedia addresses libel and Censorship. I recently edited the Wikipedia article on Simon Ekpa to bring about clarity but it got reverted. How do we go from here? Fugabus (talk) 19:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Well there is WP:Libel but I am not sure that applies in this instance. What is your concern with the article? Is it just the title of "prime minister"? LegalSmeagolian (talk) 19:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much, this has proven to be helpful after I read through it and I cited it here to bring attention of editors. The issue of the Prime Minister is already getting resolved and you may wish to join us. Fugabus (talk) 19:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)