User talk:LegalRealism

RE: Request to restore Judicial Shamanism article

Hi. I'll first note that I wasn't the one who requested the articles deletion, nor the one who supplied the reason "appears to be a neologism created to express the author's point of view. The cited sources don't use this term". I only deleted the article after its Proposed Deletion went uncontested for a 5-day period.

Anyhow, as the Proposed Deletion policy allows, I've went ahead and restored the article. - Rjd0060 (talk) 22:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Judical Shamanism

Hi there. I was involved in the debate about the old judicial shamanism article. Any chance you could cite the references you mention: page numbers, ISBNs, that kind of thing? I'd like to do some research into the topic. JustIgnoreMe (talk) 18:58, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Judicial Shamanism

A tag has been placed on Judicial Shamanism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Terraxos (talk) 19:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Judicial Shamanism

I have nominated Judicial Shamanism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judicial Shamanism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Robofish (talk) 17:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]