User talk:Lefootop

This is Lefootop's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Soviet-Moroccan Naval incident (1981) has been accepted

Soviet-Moroccan Naval incident (1981), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LittlePuppers (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Lefootop (talk) 18:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Partially blocked from User talk:M.Bitton

Hello. I have blocked you from editing User talk:M.Bitton’s talk page, as you have repeatedly tried to re-add comments there after he requested you not do so. Editors are allowed a large amount of latitude on their talk pages, and you are expected to honor requests that you not edit them within reason.

It seems that the concerns you have with M. Bitton relate to a revert at List of wars involving Morocco; you should continue discussion of that article’s content at its talk page, Talk:List of wars involving Morocco. Concerns related to longer-term problematic editing should be brought to WP:ANI, but be forewarned that you will be expected to provide WP:DIFFs that clearly establish a pattern of inappropriate behavior, and your own edits will be scrutinized in the process; I do not recommend bringing concerns to ANI at this time.

This partial block is set to expire automatically in 1 week. You may attempt to appeal it before then by following the instructions at WP:UNBLOCK, but given the brevity of the block and its very limited scope, I don’t think this would be a worthwhile use of your time. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He has never requested me not to do so. In fact, he has told me to go on the talk page yet he deletes my messages everytime i put out a new message. My concerns with M.Bitton are about the way he falsifies any article about Moroccan history or about Morocco in itself. I hope you're happy to learn that you have been defending a falsifier of history that most likely works for the Algerian government. Lefootop (talk) 22:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

M.Bitton’s replies on their user talk page are quite clear. Accusations of falsifying history and working for [insert government or other entity you don’t like], without proper WP:DIFFs to back them, are personal attacks. You will be blocked from editing entirely if you continue to make such allegations without providing concrete evidence. Further, the only forum on Wikipedia where it is appropriate for you to raise such behavioral concerns is WP:ANI, as I have already instructed you. If you have relevant diffs, by all means make a case there, and ping me so that I can properly notify M. Bitton as required by ANI rules (normally you would be required to do so yourself in order to file the report, but as I have blocked you from Bitton’s talk page you would not be able to do so). _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can i provide WP:DIFFs? Lefootop (talk) 23:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read through the linked page, it has instructions. Presumably there are concrete edits made by M. Bitton you believe are examples of tendentious editing: provide links to them and succinctly summarize your case. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thank you for your help. Lefootop (talk) 23:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Soviet-Moroccan fishing vessel incident (1980-1981) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soviet-Moroccan fishing vessel incident (1980-1981) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soviet-Moroccan fishing vessel incident (1980-1981) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M.Bitton (talk) 23:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of wars involving the Soviet Union. M.Bitton (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 16:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]