User talk:Leesjy2k

June 2022

Your edit to Lee Kuan Yew has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Urination, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 19:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Admin / CU please note, that if the CU check isn't a problem, it was my intention to block for WP:NOTHERE, so if you are considering removing the block, please notify me so that I may simply convert the block myself. This has been discussed on the talk page of Drmies. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:59, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Dennis Brown, the easiest thing for me to do was to simply change the block, and I agree with you. Leesjy2k, if you wish to object, you may do so, of course--but one of the things you'll have to do is explain some of these edits, including this addition of 507 vulvas. Dreamy Jazz, Ponyo, thank you for your help. Drmies (talk) 21:31, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Agree with the block and happy to help. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leesjy2k (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not include the various images added in the “Additional images”, despite them being adequate in terms of showcasing diversity. However, many of my edits contained useful information that was descriptive and not disruptive. They have been separated from the main article through galleries. Leesjy2k (talk) 23:39, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're not going to be unblocked if you plan on continuing to add unnecessarily explicit and excessive images to articles that already have sufficient images, regardless if those images are in "additional images"/galleries or inline. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Drmies: @Dreamy Jazz: @Dennis Brown: I will commit to not include various images in the additional images section, however there were numerous descriptive edits that I did, that was informative and not disruptive. Leesjy2k (talk) 23:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The only way I would sign on is if there was an indef topic ban agreed to, on sex and sexuality, which could be appealed in 12 months. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree with that. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 00:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@OhNoitsJamie: @Dreamy Jazz: @Dennis Brown: I can commit to reducing the amount of uploaded images from Wikimedia commons. However, certain images that I have uploaded, are accurate depictions that do not have an alternative. Eg. Positions of urination, actual usage of condoms etc. Images of Vulvas uploaded will be restrained from now on. Leesjy2k (talk) 02:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need your restrained photos of vulvas. Per above, I wouldn't consider an unblock without a sexuality topic ban. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@OhNoitsJamie: I have committed to not editing the article on vulvas as I admit the amount of pictures I added there was excessive. However, there are other articles that is appropriate to add upon, such as female ejaculate, intercourse and urination that can be expanded upon, as actual human depictions are missing from the article. Censorship of accurate scientific bodily positions is not justified. Leesjy2k (talk) 04:13, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz:@Dennis Brown: I have committed to not editing the article on vulvas as I admit the amount of pictures I added there was excessive. However, there are other articles that is appropriate to add upon, such as female ejaculate, intercourse and urination that can be expanded upon, as actual human depictions are missing from the article. Censorship of accurate scientific bodily positions is not justified. Leesjy2k (talk) 04:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with you unblock attempts. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not ping me repeatedly. I am watching this discussion. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: I have committed to not editing the article on vulvas as I admit the amount of pictures I added there was excessive. However, there are other articles that is appropriate to add upon, such as female ejaculate, intercourse and urination that can be expanded upon, as actual human depictions are missing from the article. Censorship of accurate scientific bodily positions is not justified. Leesjy2k (talk) 07:07, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one is censoring the articles. You obviously do not understand the meaning of the word "censorship", which is when a government prevents citizens from expressing opinions and ideas Your additions to these articles has been a detriment to Wikipedia. We are proposing the only way for you to get unblocked. If it isn't agreeable, fine, but you will likely remain blocked. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:48, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let me update my topic ban criteria: "topic banned from all articles and discussions that cover sexuality and nudity". that is the same thing only worded more clearly, to make it easier for you to comply. Again, if this is not acceptable, I understand, but it's the only way you will me to sign off on an unblock, and I'm not alone in this. You've edited other topics before, and you still will be able to edit those. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:57, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dennis Brown: I will accept that I will be banned from editing any articles and discussion relating to sexuality and nudity. Leesjy2k (talk) 11:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies made the block(s), so the final decision will be by him. I would agree with the unblock, and it appears that Dreamy Jazz would as well. Be forewarned that we don't play around with topic bans, if you try to skirt around the topic ban, you will be blocked again, likely for an indefinite period of time. Ohnoitsjamie didn't make a firm commitment either way, but again, I think Drmies should have the final say, as he (and I) are both likely the most up to date on the block. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 17:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dennis Brown:, I would be fine with that. Drmies (talk) 18:07, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: I will accept that I will be banned from editing any articles and discussion relating to sexuality and nudity. Leesjy2k (talk) 02:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: I will accept that I will be banned from editing any articles and discussion relating to sexuality and nudity. Leesjy2k (talk) 02:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop pinging people. Make another unblock request that includes your topic ban agreement, and someone will see it on the noticeboard and review it. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:31, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Leesjy2k (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will accept that I will be banned from editing any articles and discussion relating to sexuality and nudity. Leesjy2k (talk) 05:15, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I will unblock you on the basis of your agreement with the topic ban from "all articles and discussions that cover sexuality and nudity" and the fact that Drmies indicates they are okay with that. Be advised that you will be reblocked, possibly without warning, should you violate the ban. You may appeal the ban in 12 months. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. What will you edit about? 331dot (talk) 08:16, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: I will edit about various other topics such as politicians and sports that are completely unrelated to sexuality. Leesjy2k (talk) 09:43, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would have unblocked myself, but I've been undergoing some medical stuff so avoiding using bits and such for a couple of days. His history is mainly of topics other than sexusality and nudity, which is why I made the initial offer. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 01:10, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Your edit to Anti-Americanism has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 12:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LIV season pages

Hi there, regarding your edits on the LIV Golf season pages. I originally reverted them because there is a standard table layout we use for each tour. As a lot of these tables are generically wide, we don’t add in extraneous information (such as winners share or breakdown of prize money, even if it is widely reported) to the season article, fitting into WP:TMI. There are many statistics and info that is widely reported by media that is not best suited for the season results article, but would be better included in other articles, e.g. scoring, leaderboards, weather, crowd attendance etc. In the case here, info such as the winners share is better placed in individual tournament articles e.g. Wells Fargo Championship, Arnold Palmer Invitational, Dubai Desert Classic etc. Please feel free to create articles for the individual LIV tournaments should you wish, as winners share and breakdown of prize money would be better suited there. Jimmymci234 (talk) 06:51, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of World Athletics-certified Athletic Facilities

Hello, Leesjy2k. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of World Athletics-certified Athletic Facilities".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ChatGPT availability by country or region for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ChatGPT availability by country or region is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChatGPT availability by country or region until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ A412 ^talk! 18:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]