User talk:Leeborkman
Welcome!
Hello, Leeborkman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
I also noticed that you edited an article related to The Chronicles of Narnia. I thought you may be interested in knowing that there is a WikiProject working to improve articles about Narnia, your help would be greatly appreciated. Please consider joining the WikiProject Narnia. Thank you! Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 21:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Susan/Gaiman
[edit]I thought that I was agreeing with you about the way the identity of professor was presented. Your take on the story seems like an entirely reasonable explanation to me. Did I maybe misread your post on the talk page? Or maybe you misread mine? Your last comment seemed a little out of place to me. LloydSommerer 02:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi Lloyd. Yes, we do agree!!
[edit]Sorry about any confusion, Lloyd. I was writing that last piece on the Susan Talk page at the same time as you were writing your very gracious response to my initial comment, so that my comment was no longer relevant. Anyway, we crossed paths going back and forth. I don't know exactly how to avoid these kinds of misunderstandings, but I'm very impressed that you would got to the trouble of re-reading the story and actually changing your mind. That is not something that I myself find easy to do.
Anyway, thanks again, and I'm sorry if I have caused any offence. Leeborkman 03:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- That was the oddest bit of "cross editing" I've ever been a part of. We were each a step behind the other. No hard feelings. You should join Wikipedia:WikiProject Narnia (if you like the project sort of thing). LloydSommerer 02:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Bradman table
[edit]You need to add what the cut-off for the selection is. Tintin (talk) 05:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- I have done that now, Tintin. Leeborkman 05:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
SF
[edit](But Hayford is almost certainly right. Or don't You agree?)Kdammers 00:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Is Hayford right about SF writers writing with commercial considerations in mind? Actually, I was thinking about Hayford's example of turning a cowboy tale into SF, and it occurred to me that Western and SF settings can often be freely interchanged, as the frontier/settler society is a basic theme in both. I don't doubt that SF is overly commercialised, but I do doubt that this is something that is peculiar to SF. My experience as an SF reader is that there are actually only 20 or 30 SF books at the most that I would actually recommend to a friend, even an SF-reading friend. SF shelves are full of rubbish. On the other hand, I suspect that that is probably true of all genres. So I guess I have no problem with Hayford (who should know) saying these things - I just don't think they are appropriate or useful in the article leader, which is no place to be cynical. Is there a section on Criticisms of Science Fiction? If not, I think there certainly should be, and that would be the appropriate place for these things (but still requiring reputable sources. Good to talk to you... Leeborkman 00:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Atheism
[edit]Hi. Changed the entry paragraph for atheism recently (hadn't logged in yet) and you reverted me. Why do you think this relevant distinction (strong and weak atheism / atheism and agnosticism) needs to be repeated twice? MadMaxDog 15:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
The following is a response to your recent edit [1]:
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you!
Xiner 18:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the form letter, Xiner. In light of your subsequent comments, it does make me smile. Leeborkman 02:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Your recent deletion from Aubrey–Maturin series
[edit]I support your removal of the PoV stuff about the supposed difficulty of POB's narrative style and diction, but I don't think you have gone far enough. I think the whole of that paragraph should go, it is bilge from stem to stern.
A careful reading of the first novel shows that O'Brien *does* explain naval jargon, and does so through the subtle medium of getting Mowett, Bonden and others to explain things to the doctor. In later books the theme is developed by Maturin and the Rev. Martin trying to explain jargon to each other, or failing hopelessly to understand Jack's explanation of sailing into the wind that involves bits of string and bread at the dinner table, etc.
Can we work up a better paragraph on this? I will flick through the various essays in the back of my editions to see if one of those mentions this and can be referenced here. We need some more references and citations and much less PoV in this article.
Thruston 12:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Tony Robinson
[edit]Since you asked for an explanation of my revert, it was because his Baldric role was discussed elsewhere in the article, and a lengthy discussion of it in the first paragraph might have been inappropriate. That is what he is remembered for outside the UK and by older people, but younger people probably know him best from Time Patrol, and we dont want to weigh the initial para too heavily one way or the other. Hornplease 08:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
SF vs Science Fiction vs Sci-Fi
[edit]This? - Well abbrievations shouldnt be used as this isnt abbreviation hell, this is also an encyclopeadia and as such should conform to a NPOV and also Wikipedia:Manual of style#Acronyms and abbreviations states:
Do not assume that your reader is familiar with the acronym or abbreviation you are using.
thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 07:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Retitling? - Also the only compromise i can really think of is a brief mention of both in the intro, which is already done. The title science fiction is neutral, where as SF or Sci-Fi is not, as you could imagine if i changed all occurances of SF to Sci-Fi Hayford Pierce would get agitated, just as i would if Sci-Fi was changed to SF. SF could mean anything anyway outside the realm of science fiction (San Francisco for example) so abbreivations and the shortend form of Sci-Fi should not ber used in the context of the article. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 07:31, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- An abriv. could help but then you've got which one should be used? Theres three partys: SF clan, Science fiction group, and Sci-Fi people. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 07:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
+Frank Hamer
[edit]You got a problem with Jews? stop reverting my "Shit". Isnt Australia where Englishmen congregate to screw Kangaroos? "Rubbish"-nurdy bastard
- Hi, who am I talking to? Leeborkman 00:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Mahatma Gandhi revert
[edit]Hi. Your revert was unnecessary. The anon inserted vandalism with this edit and later reverted himself with this one. You reinstated the previous vandalised one by mistake. I have corrected it. Cheers! - Aksi_great (talk) 12:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Treasurer
[edit]In most countries the "finance minister" is what our Treasurer would be - we came to a consensus that Australian-specific terms should be explained given the 'pedia's world-wide readership. PMA 12:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Science fiction
[edit]I see you're back. Did you ever look at the equivalent article on The Literary Encyclopedia? ;) I don't know if you have access ... Metamagician3000 02:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikiproject Narnia Newsletter March 2007
[edit]
WikiProject Narnia Newsletter Issue 1 - 2nd March 2007 . Written by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
WikiProject World music invitation
[edit]You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject World music
The goal of WikiProject World music is to improve the quality and quantity of information about World music available on Wikipedia. WP:WikiProject World music as a group does not prefer any particular type of World music, but prefers that all World music traditions are fairly and accurately represented. |
-- TimNelson 23:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIII - April 2008
[edit]The April 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 22:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008
[edit]The May 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveCrossinBot (talk) 08:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXV - June 2008
[edit]The June 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveBot (owner) 02:39, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Novels is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. Also feel free to join any of our task forces and take a look at the project's Job Centre to get involved!
Next month we will begin the coordinator election selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone! María (habla conmigo) 18:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Novels Newsletter - September 2008
[edit]The WikiProject Novels Newsletter
Issue XXVI - September 2008 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 15:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2018
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barry O'Sullivan, you may be blocked from editing. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)