User talk:LeeG

On Fairview shopping

Its not junk if its true.. Someone was shot in the bus station last year... Its a very dirty part of the mall... I think I will make a forward challenge..

On handball disambiguation

Yes, it's always better to evaluate whether a disambiguation is really necessary before delving in. In this case I had to reiterate this because another user made a mistake, but you proved my point nicely. :) I'd appreciate it if you could leave a note on Talk:Handball (disambiguation) about your opinion on where the link should point, so that we have it on record over there. --Joy [shallot] 23:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Knockout for 2006 FIFA world cup

Your recent edit to Knockout for 2006 FIFA world cup was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 23:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit upheld - article now deleted. LeeG 02:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link at Skuld (Oh My Goddess!)

It is now fixed. Since these are norse goddesses, I think we are looking at Classical element Cat ^chi? 09:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sorting the element link out from the Oh My Goddess infoboxes. LeeG 11:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anything for Skuld :) Cat ^chi? 12:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I made a slight change to your edit

Thank you! I just wanted to get the article out of Wikify March 2006 and knew I was't taking proper care with the links. So I'm glad you corrected it KarenAnn 13:13, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I may have found your page based on your contributions or your link repair user box on your user page. If you are not a member, please consider including your name on the project page. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 23:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gravitor/Carfiend

He's starting to come after you now, too. I wonder how long the admin will sit on this item. I am getting thoroughly irritated with this character. I have gotten to the point where I am simply saying in the article talk page, "Gravitor does not approve..." in order to save some time. And notice, if you will, that he has not responded sarcastically or argumentatively to that comment. Because he knows it's true. If I get blocked for awhile for further "egging him on", it will be worth it, if he gets blocked also. Wahkeenah 22:05, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're wiser than the rest of us. In fairness to the admin, there may be some prescribed minimum wait time to see whether the "accused" cleans up his act... which Gravitor shows no signs of doing. He's the classic "dog in the manger". Wahkeenah 22:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Everyone stopped playing with Gravitor, and he left he playground. I wouldn't rule out that he's lurking nearby, waiting for the rest of the kids to come back because they think the coast is clear from the bully. Wahkeenah 01:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm not saying not to try. You don't know until you try. All I know is, when the RFC heat got too much for Carfiend in September, the both of them disappeared for 3 or 4 months and then came back, except this time Gravitor was the primary offender and Carfiend merely parroted him a few times. Wahkeenah 01:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive Comment?

You are aware he is pretty much dumping on everything that he US stands for right? I have a right to keep my profile as I will and it's not his job to censor my views because he doesnt like them, if we removed everything that people found offensive from Wikipedia there would not be much left. Given that his objection derives from me discussing Nazism, I guess that means the Hitler, World War 2, hell even the Germany article will have to go in case somone is offended.

people's feelings bruise too easily, that is my point, and he is in no way entitled to censor me.

Any how thanks for returning the comment at least.Cosmic Larva 01:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it dude and I apologize myself for posting here about it. The only reason I was so harsh with him is free Speech is something I feel very strongly about, and I dont think it's his place, whether Wikipedia enables him to or not, to declare something he finds offensive unfit for MY user page, a place where by definition I put my thoughts and opinions. I dont think I should feel liek I need to censor my thoughts or opinions because someone may be inveribly offended by them. Either way the comment he removed was far from offensive, it was a reference to a TV show which apparently he didnt get for one reason or another.

Any how sorry to have taken up your time. Cosmic Larva 01:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

((unblock-auto|1=199.172.210.66|2=repeated vandalism from this range, sorry|3=Can't sleep, clown will eat me))

Er, help I seem to be blocked and I am not sure why! LeeG 17:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find your autoblock. I'll ask the blocking admin to take a look. Sandstein 19:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lee. Please try logging in again in a few minutes and this should be resolved. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

James Bond

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to James Bond, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. T_im.boun^ceback - TaLk 23:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, not vandalism - I hit the revert button as the other user did, and in error reverted his or her correction of vandalism. I have now put it back, as I spotted the error immediately. Oops. LeeG 23:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I think there was a lot of confusion due to everyone hitting the revert button at the same time ;-)... T_im.boun^ceback - TaLk 23:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC) (copied by me from Tim's talkpage) LeeG 23:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

XVreturns

thank you for reverting my userpage. :-) XVreturns 00:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo

The red-link user Axlalta was another one from last summer that seemed to be a Carfiend/Gravitor clone. Wahkeenah 04:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. That was very quick. Much appreciated. --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 21:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THENTHORNTHING -USERPAGE COMMENTS

Hi i was wondering whether you could take two minutes of your time to comment, whether my userpage is better or worse than what it was here Thanks Thenthornthing 15:33, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no the Red wasn't supposed to be London Bus style... but you saying that has gave me an idea... Thenthornthing 20:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage! Sr13 (T|C) 02:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

for reverting vandalism on my user page! -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 00:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Falklands War article

Lee, can we come to some agreement of this issue, with regards the opening paragraph, as it stand all the alternate English language names for the war are listed with the sole exception of the "Malvinas War". Surely this is not reflecting a balanced and neutral POV. regards--Vintagekits 17:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

hey LeeG. thanks for clarifying that. :) i actually do have a profile, for some reason i wasn't signed in. woops.

Thank you,

sorry abou that, just learning about the entire process of posting. Ill leave the editing to the pros. hopefully there will be something about this soon on the page. Regards.

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]