User talk:Lee/Archives/2020/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Lee. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Harrasments
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
This user (user:Walter Görlitz) is rudely reverting my edits including the message on his talk page. A troll? Can somebody help me with this? --Lee (talk) 14:30, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Lee! I'm not seeing anything rude here - I presume you mean this edit and this edit? A single reasoned revert of your single edit seems fairly reasonable in my opinion - part of the bold, revert, discuss cycle. Users are also allowed to remove posts on their own talk page - and in this case to me it looks like again Walter has given a reason - a redirection to the article talk page to gain consensus there, which is better as it allows more participants to become aware of the discussion. My advice here is to assume a bit of good faith and take it to the article's talk page and gain consensus there. stwalkerster (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment stwalkerster. There's also an edit notice on my talk page that reads, in part, "If you're here to tell me about an edit of yours that I reverted, please explain why it should be included on the article's talk page. I likely have the article on my watchlist and will see it eventually." Article talk pages are always the correct place to discuss changes to articles because others can support your opinions. It's also good because discussions like this affect the article and you don't want consensus to be formed in an out-of-the way place that others have to hunt for. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- So the best way to deal with a situations is to discourage communications? So you think you own Wikipedia? Could you at least take away the user box that says you are a *christian*, for I do not believe a christian person is supposed to be that rude! --Lee (talk) 02:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Listen. Edit warring is not going to get you to resolution. I'm not sure why you think I'm being rude. I'm simply opposing your incorrect edits. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- "Hatnotes provide links to the possibly sought article or to a disambiguation page."--Lee (talk) 06:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me? You're edit warring now and accusing me of not explaining.
- Is there a link to the article you think requires the hatnote in the first sentence of the article or not? Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- "Hatnotes provide links to the possibly sought article or to a disambiguation page."--Lee (talk) 06:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Listen. Edit warring is not going to get you to resolution. I'm not sure why you think I'm being rude. I'm simply opposing your incorrect edits. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- So the best way to deal with a situations is to discourage communications? So you think you own Wikipedia? Could you at least take away the user box that says you are a *christian*, for I do not believe a christian person is supposed to be that rude! --Lee (talk) 02:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment stwalkerster. There's also an edit notice on my talk page that reads, in part, "If you're here to tell me about an edit of yours that I reverted, please explain why it should be included on the article's talk page. I likely have the article on my watchlist and will see it eventually." Article talk pages are always the correct place to discuss changes to articles because others can support your opinions. It's also good because discussions like this affect the article and you don't want consensus to be formed in an out-of-the way place that others have to hunt for. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)