User talk:Ledboots19

Ledboots19, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ledboots19! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Gen X

Agree with your comments entirely. Am going to post something later along the terms of a total re-write. Feedback appreciated. Hanoi Road (talk) 20:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You said you've been monitoring and contributing to this article for a long time.[1] Under which accounts? Kolya Butternut (talk) 03:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Originally it was my current username without the 19. Ledboots19 (talk) 12:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Oqwert (talk) 13:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hut 8.5 18:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ledboots19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

China was a not a an important ally in WWII and most of the success against the Japanese came from the US, Britain and the Anzacs. Yet in typical Chinese distort-the-truth fashion, they are the first photo entry as if they led the charge against the Axis powers! Ledboots19 (talk) 23:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 01:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I also find this request racist; further such comments will not be tolerated and you will lose access to this page if they continue. 331dot (talk) 01:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]