User talk:Lechaim66

Welcome!

Hello, Lechaim66, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

September 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kabbalah. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. In particular, the use of peacock words, as well as pushing for only one teacher's particular interpretation rather than summerizing the majority of varied teachings labelled as Kabbalah (as the previous version did). Ian.thomson (talk) 03:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kabbalah, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. removing the Judaism template from an article about traditional Jewish Kabbalah and adding your own research. Dougweller (talk) 16:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Adam. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dougweller (talk) 16:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lechaim, you must familiarise yourself with our core content policies, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR and WP:V; if your edits violate these they are likely to be reverted on th spot. Also, full articles (as opposed to stubs) usually reflect the hard work of many editors. If you see small ways to improve them, great! But if you wish to make major changes, you should consider raising them on the talk page first. WP is a collaborative project. Slrubenstein | Talk 18:35, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat: read our core content policies. The views of Issac Luria, Chaim Vital, Rav Kook, Baal HaSulam, Baruch Ashlag can and to an extent are provided in the article. But weuse primary sources with extreme care and only to make certain kinds of points. Your edits all violated NPOV, NOR, and V. This is not a question of whose views are included in an article, it is a question of how they are included. And so far, you have just been including your own view, which willnever be acceptable. Slrubenstein | Talk 09:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]