User talk:Learjetsuperkingairmechanic

Welcome!

Hello, Learjetsuperkingairmechanic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 20:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Faith Healing

You wrote: "Wow, it's great to see so many different articles on the different types of Church of the Firstborn. My father gets those same directories but I didn't know there was one out for 2006 yet. I usually find the General Assembly: Church of the Firstborn buildings tucked away in small towns and growing up in that church, there are some congregations that won't go to doctors due to scriptures stating that when others are sick they should seek the elders of the church and have them lay hands on them and pray to heal them. No worries though, I grew up going to doctors all my life. It was a few of my childhood friends who weren't so fortunate. If you want some reading material, try to google the name and check out all the cases of dying babies and mothers that are from Cushing, Oklahoma. Talk to ya'll later!"

I am not from Cushing, but I can tell you this: critics target us because of our methods. You rarely hear of the mistakes that are made too often in hospitals, because they don't want to discourage doctoring.

I personally know a woman (my aunt, actually) who was cured of cancer without medication... she had the tissue of the cancer, which simply fell off, tested to confirm that it was cancer.

If you reply, odds are that I won't continue communicating... I have long known that there is no point in trying to convince others of my beliefs... or to accept them. For some reason, though, I just had to say this. SirVenom (talk) 06:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SirVenom,

I agree with you. The power of Faith Healing truely is a great thing. One of my aunts who attend the Parkland General Assembly: Church of the Firstborn was diagnosed with diabeties early in life and when relying on the elders of the church, came to find out it was as if she had never had diabeties at all. Praise be to God and all he does for us. Thank you for your post on my talk page and I appreciate your communication. God bless and have a great day.Learjetsuperkingairmechanic (talk) 15:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your response is different than I expected, I am glad to see you aren't bashing me like the average person would :) Parkland church.... I think I heard of it, but never been there.

Thank you and have a nice day. SirVenom (talk) 22:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stay strong

Keep your edits up bro. You're good and I know you are and PROTECT YOUR PASSWORD! Untzuntzuntzbaby (talk) 21:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you supppossed to do when your password is stolen?P2O74SS4696p (talk) 17:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can avoid having your password 'stolen' by not giving it to anyone, by not choosing an easy-to-guess password, and by logging out if you share a computer with others. By the way, you forgot to log out of your other sockpuppet account and into this one before responding. Thanks; that made it simpler. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Man

It's imperitive that you stick to your guns and keep editing the faith of your father. I know wikipedia is kind of a liars tale but people like you make it real so stick to your guns. If they block you so what, you've alway got lots of computers and ip adresses to make a new account. I'll apologize on behalf of the editors and admin on wikipeidia dude. This isn't right. Make a new id and better protect your password. Remember OPSEC. 197941g4 (talk) 22:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Learjetsuperkingairmechanic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is crazy! The same admin keeps ganging up on me! Is there anyway to prevent things like these personal vendetta's?

Decline reason:

I'm sorry if you didn't understand the reason for your block. The reason for your block is not a personal vendetta; it is that you have created these multiple accounts to avoid your block. When you are blocked, we expect you to refrain from editing, not try to avoid the block and keep editing. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Multiple Accounts?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Learjetsuperkingairmechanic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't have multiple accounts. I keep trying to protect my talk page but admin keeps ganging up on me and saying I'm a sock puppet along with these other accounts and this is the only account I have. Even my friends have shown their support on my talk page. I even left my professional email and personal phone number on my page for someone to call me so we could get this worked out. I just don't understand. I removed the sock puppet tag once but someone came and put it back so I left and wrote that editor but I couldn't really get a valid reason for that either.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but the evidence explained to you at User talk:Adolphus79 is very convincing. Plus, you were blocked by a checkuser who can verify your IP address when you are logged in. And your language has suggested multiple times that you consider making new accounts a viable option. Mango juice^talk 16:08, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you explain the relationship between yourself and those accounts? If you are not the same person, you appear to be closely related; are you all working in the same office, or members of the same family? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:58, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response

I am the only one living in my house, but we are part of a small community in Ahloso and share an internet connection via wireless router. Brian Kervin is my neighbhor and I work with Untzuntzuntzbaby and his twin brother Ootzootzootzbaby. The .8X IP's are shared across Tinker AFB which we have millions of employee's who use those IP's base wide not to mention the library on the base, but I'm only a reservist and I believe that's where my password was first compromised. Brian works out there with me too. As far as my civilian employer we have 7,000 employee's who share one IP address so I haven't a clue. If you can shed some light on the situation it would be very helpful. I don't know P2O74SS4696p though. I think he/she was trying to ask an honest question. Learjetsuperkingairmechanic (talk) 00:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Follow Up

I also believe user Adolphus79 has a personal vendetta against whoever this sock puppet is because anyone who comments or even leaves any evidence of being on another users page tags them as a sock puppet. I originally tagged him as a sock puppet because I believed him to be the perp, but then after careful research it seems like we all got caught up chasing eachother instead of the proper identity. I would highly appreciate it if someone could tell me how to change my password as well. Learjetsuperkingairmechanic (talk) 00:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may have forgotten, but you tagged him as a sockpuppet using one of your other accounts, not this one. See? That tends to undermine your claim that you are not using other accounts.-FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Continued Investigation

Okay, so I just tried to edit from work and it said I was blocked for "No Reason Given" by an editor named auburnpilot. I notice that he's had a lot of trouble in the past year if not beyond with the .8x IP's. What should I do next? Learjetsuperkingairmechanic (talk) 13:39, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are blocked from editing. Were you trying to edit from work using this blocked account, or a different account? User:Auburnpilot has never blocked this account. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That would be the block I placed on 66.142.195.205 (talk · contribs). I mistakenly left the block summary blank when tweaking the block options to remove "anon-only". These Tinker AFB IPs have been causing the very same problems for over a year now, and I have no doubt all of the current blocked accounts are related (hell, they make the same edits). - auburnpilot talk 04:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One More Time

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Learjetsuperkingairmechanic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My page has been vandalized, my name ran through the mud and myself and my friends have been ganged up on by admin. Someone, please help!

Decline reason:

We can protect your user and user talk pages if you'd like to keep providing invalid reasons to unblock you - that'll stop any vandalism you think you're getting, and save us some time. Please see WP:GAB. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 14:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reviewing editors, don't miss this since-removed edit. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where did that derogatory statement about my faith and my personal characteristic come from? This is very confusing because it was added under my account. Is there anyway to figure out which IP address it came from? Thanks. Learjetsuperkingairmechanic (talk) 11:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So far so good

Well, I changed my password and it looks like there has been no activity on behalf of my account! Great news! When will I be unblocked though? Learjetsuperkingairmechanic (talk) 12:35, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Learjetsuperkingairmechanic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After talking to my friend Stephanie I've realized that many accounts have been labeled a sock puppet account of the .8x and even beyone that so I'm trying one more time. Thank you for your pateince and please understand I want to spearhead my firstborn article right away. Thank you.

Decline reason:

You do not provide a reason for your unblock request, see below. Page protected for abuse of the unblock tag. — Sandstein 06:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What exactly is your reason for ~~being~~ wanting to be unblocked? From what I can tell, it's that many other accounts are sockpuppets as well. That doesn't make any sense. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]