User talk:Lead lady 77

Notability of French Creek Bible Conference

A tag has been placed on French Creek Bible Conference, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. janejellyroll 01:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Harrisburg Christian School

It may not have been your intent, but a recent edit of yours removed virtually all content from this talk page. Please don't delete the talk page comments of others. It can be considered vandalism. janejellyroll 21:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my apologies, was more of a mistake than intent. also, are you paid to watchdog? or do you just not work much?

Like the vast majority of those on Wikipedia, I am a volunteer. And I work plenty. I just enjoy doing this as a hobby. janejellyroll 01:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S., regarding your edits on Talk:Moustache cup, you might find it helpful to sign your comments with four tildes (~). That way other editors can see at a glance who made the comment. janejellyroll 01:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes well, you do realize that this is a non-factual, subjective, arbitrary, non-professional, non-scholastic, megalomaniac’s dream because no one can prove authenticity. I may state I have B.A. in Humanities, but in actuality I haven’t even made it past the 12th grade. Credibility in the science of research is essential. GO TO YOUR LOCAL LIBRARY and look it up! There is a reason colleges do not accept a citation from these articles, and professional industry-related peer reviews are essential because they have an actual proven background in the subject! Lead lady 77 01:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, where did that come from? The college that I went to didn't accept any encyclopedia as a source, paper or online. As far as the B.A. business . . . Wikipedia isn't about credentials. We let our edits speak for themselves. I could state that I was a PhD, but it wouldn't make any difference if my edits were not in keeping with Wikipedia policy. janejellyroll 01:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]