User talk:Le crochet

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of 222.152.0.154 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of 222.155.215.169 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Your recent editing history at Air France shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. HkCaGu (talk) 04:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 04:12, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Le crochet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry :-( I did not mean any harm to the fellow users of Wikipedia, I am very sorry for my actions on the 16th of Decemeber. I have accept that I made mistakes and I ask the Wikipedia community to have it in their hearts to unblock me. I also want to apologize especially to Wikipedia user: HkCaGu. I hope you will allow me to enter back into the Wikipedia community so I can help improve Wikipedia for the better. Thank you-Le Crochet

Decline reason:

Does not address WP:SOCK/WP:EVADE issues. WP:GAB might be of assistance. You will need to address ALL of the disruptive issues surrounding your block (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.