Jump to content

User talk:Le Wiki Brah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well, how the heck are you? It's nice to hear from you!! The fact that you were able to edit my page via the new user name means that your IP wasn't blocked. You can start fresh with this new user name if you prefer. Just be good this time, ya hear? I'm keepin' my eye on you, Andy!  :)) - Lucky 6.9 03:44, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to go against the administrator who blocked you, so the best thing for me to do is to contact him and see if it's OK with him. I may have to take it before the arbitration committee, but I don't think that'll be necessary. In the meantime, I got to thinking that you shouldn't edit via the new user name until I straighten things out for you. Hang tight and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. - Lucky 6.9 03:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • OK, I've left word with Tony Sidaway who blocked you in the first place. What I suggest you do is to lay low and not edit until I hear back from Tony. I'll contact you via this talk page. Promise me that you won't be writing about any more "sexy Jewish sluts" and the like. That's what got you blocked and will certainly get you blocked again if you start back in with those kinds of edits. Be good, be patient and I'll talk to you soon. - Lucky 6.9 04:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet, but he may have e-mailed me. I haven't forgotten you.  :) - Lucky 6.9 02:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting that silliness regarding that fake Internet meme. I haven't heard back from Tony yet. I'll give a shout at the Village Pump in hopes that a bureaucrat will see it. Technically, I can reinstate you but I want to go by the book. - Lucky 6.9 07:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Went to the administrators' noticeboard instead. You can see the post here:[1] - Lucky 6.9 07:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tony and a few other users are dead-set against it. I'm sorry. - Lucky 6.9 00:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • It means that technically, you still can't edit and this account will likely be blocked. The best advice I can give you at this point is to leave word on Tony Sidaway's talk page and ask in person. Good luck. - Lucky 6.9 01:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Just been busy. Sorry.  :) Seems you have an offer for help! Since I was so deeply involved before, it's probably best that I keep out of the way. My suggestions are as follows: Edit only while sober, don't create nonsense edits, read the tutorial pages to learn how to create a good article and don't get upset if some of your edits are reverted. It's part of the learning curve. I have to let you know that I'm extremely uncomfortable with you avoiding a block via a sockpuppet and that I should block this account under the rules. I am sticking my neck out on this and I may get in serious trouble if you act badly. I just got my adminship back due to the efforts of Jimbo Wales himself and I don't want to blow this. I left in good stead, but Jimbo thought it was best to run my request for reinstatement by the arbitration committee, who agreed to renew my privilege...and it is a privilege. Tony or another admin may very well block this account and they'd be right in doing so. One thing you have in your favor is the fact that you didn't create this account to sneak around a block and that you were honest as to why you created it. Remember that while this is a community effort and a lot of fun, the end result is very, very serious and needs to be taken seriously. Vandalism is at an all-time high and vandal accounts are being blocked by the dozens every day. If you blow this chance and this account is blocked, it is going to stay blocked. It will have to be. - Lucky 6.9 02:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Le Wiki Brah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

Wiki Brah, you have not demonstrated that you have reformed. While you started out correctly with polite requests from this account, you have posted at least once with this new account while high, and you inappropriately posted an RFC against Tony Sidaway when you were advised to ask to be unblocked on his talk page. Request denied.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Le_Wiki_Brah&oldid=76175262"