User talk:LeRobert93
June 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Chaouia (Morocco)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 12:00, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kutama. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 12:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
M.Bitton Almost all I write are things I have read them from real source, and never I had a vandalism purpose. I could not be invited to read the article as I think there are sets of information which need to be corrected. Anyway, it was never my object to make vandalism and you can delete my addings each time you don't feel convinced but none have ever emanated from vandalism purpose. Thank you.
a little example M.Bitton: the berber Ziri has claimed he's arab and a son of Sanhaj, you deleted this information. I don't really care if he made it on purpose but he claimed that, so this is a relevant information. Historians who lived while different eras also claimed sanhaja are Arabs, if there is some modern opinion as you said, it is not an argument to prevent all the historians sayings from wikipedia just because there are some new opinions (which are not relevant in my POV). Hope you'd understand.