User talk:Le.Polymath.22

William Bishop

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Armaghan Muawiyah for their contributions to Wikipedia.

I am asked by User: Armaghan Muawiyah, to publish his draft article to wikipedia mainstream.

According to my research: William Bishop's page should be published because, (a) Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable), (b) Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases (c) Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.

Here are the references: For (a) https://www.chinaimx.com/545/, https://music.apple.com/us/artist/william-bishop/1453976683, https://www.beaumarisartgroup.org.au/w-artist/william-bishop-artist.html, https://www.YouTube.com/WilliamBishopOfficial For (b) https://sostenescavalcante.com.br/journal/william-bishop-musician-c85dfd (forth paragraph) and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBfeA54SLKE For (c) https://uk.radioking.com/radio/good-music-radio.

Why does Armaghan Muawiyah not request unblock so he can work to add it himself, instead of enlisting others to do it for him and commit meatpuppetry? 331dot (talk) 21:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do I know sir? I myself made my own account for getting skills as I'm learning. My plan is to become one of the best Wikipedians. Kindly unblock me sir. We together will contribute in a positive way. Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 05:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I know it is Wikipedia policy to disclose paid contribution. I already did sir. Thus, this blocking is unnecessary as I am new user with no other account. Be nice and kind, and help me in a positive way. Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 06:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Le.Polymath.22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the advice 😊 Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 12:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir kindly help me. I am blocked. I am new here and still learning about wikipedia. I did everything according to the book. Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 13:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I want these articles to be published Draft: William Bishop (musician) Draft:Intellihot Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 12:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Le.Polymath.22: In relation to Draft: William Bishop (musician), you need to improve the draft, the references do not establish notability. In relation to Draft:Intellihot, its in the queue to be reviewed and using a Help tag will not make this process any quicker - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 12:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sir I had added more references which my client has sent. It's it enough? Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 13:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 331dot (talk) 12:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Le.Polymath.22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no other account on Wikipedia. I'm a new Freelancer and still learning about wikipedia so I declared that I'm paid Wikipedia user as of now I'm working on 2 articles. One is from Pradeep and 2nd is from Armaghan Muawiya.

Decline reason:

You have essentially indicated you've been violating WP:MEAT. Sure, this was via your client but that's what you get for taking on clients like that. Yamla (talk) 09:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I did everything according to book and put content and references that are given by my clients on freelancing marketplaces. I already disclosed it so why I'm blocked? As it's my only account here on Wikipedia. Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 13:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are admitting to meatpuppetry. 331dot (talk) 15:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How sir? I have no contact with my clients except on freelancer market. I already disclosed on my talk page that I'm been paid by them. But I have no other account except this one. Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to fulfill all the obligations but I my new here so I don't know about Wikipedia much. Kindly guide me if you could, but seriously it's my only account here. Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla Sir I don't know that my client is blocked. I just did my job. I'm very disappointed. Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 13:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's the risk you take in your line of work. 331dot (talk) 14:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir I accept my errors and apologize. I tried to go according to book but maybe I am lacking in somewhere. Thank you so much for replying to my request. Be happy 😌 Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 15:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intellihot (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rich Smith were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All references are either PR puff or trivial reporting

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intellihot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Intellihot, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Le.Polymath.22! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much I tried my best to improve the article Le.Polymath.22 (talk) 13:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Le.Polymath.22, your editing suggestions are on the way

SuggestBot is making a list of articles that you might like to edit. You will receive these suggestions soon. In the meantime, you might be interested in checking out the following WikiProjects. If you're interested in a project, feel free to add yourself to the member list and introduce yourself on the project talk page!