User talk:Ldt88 07

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ldt88 07, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DiverseMentality 19:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source and copyright licensing problem with Image:1never,ever.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:1never,ever.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the image under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Cicienrique.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cicienrique.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Ciaranevever.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ciaranevever.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:2nvrevr.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:2nvrevr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 23:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC) --Peripitus (Talk) 23:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:CiCiWildJam.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:CiCiWildJam.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 23:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cinvrevr.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cinvrevr.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Fearless (Jazmine Sullivan album), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Nvrevr1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nvrevr1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 21:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Videopic2.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Videopic2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy Ride release date controversy.

I fully understand you point about having the UK's release date when the album is released to the rest of the world until a day later is misleading. But at the end of the day on May 4, the album will be commericially available. Wikipedia has to deal with the facts. Wikipedia Album Rules CLEARLY states that when you list the release date for an album the earliest one goes first because in reality fans can own the album from that day. Yes Fantasy Ride is unusual in that it will be released world-wide a day after the UK but nevertheless as it is released in the UK first, UK release date is the ONLY ONE listed in the box. All other release dates have thus accordingly been listed in the release history section. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lsmvidpic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Lsmvidpic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian charts listed on WP:BADCHARTS

Please don't add the Bulgarian Singles Chart, or any other charts listed on WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 03:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Love Sex Magic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Do not add the Bulgarian Singles Chart, or any other charts listed on WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles.—Kww(talk) 20:34, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Love Sex Magic, you will be blocked from editing. You must not add the Bulgarian charts, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles. — Σ xplicit 17:51, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Love Sex Magic. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. You've continually ignored all prior warnings and guidelines shown to you. You must not add the any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles. — Σ xplicit 01:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which edit did I make that was disruptive??? Obviously i'm not blantantly being disruptive because i have contirbuted much to this page. Please be specific because I do not know what is disruptive.

Thank you for responding; for future replies, please make sure to reply here on your talk page, as I like to keep discussion in one place; I have your talk page on my watchlist. As for the warnings, over a period of time, you've added charts that have been listed in WP:BADCHARTS. Please take a look at the list, as it compiles many of the music charts you continue to add. Your latest addition here added the variant of the United World Chart, which is prohibited. These charts have been deemed as a non-notable charts, due to the fact that they're either charts that a person or group of people compile as a hobby or show no connection to the music market of that specific region. These charts are not to be added, and you've received several warnings in the past. You may not be blatantly trying to disrupt, but you ignore the guidelines and prior warnings, which is how your edits because disruptive. — Σ xplicit 01:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comment on Explicit's talk page. We've given you the link to the list of bad charts on every single warning you've been given: it's WP:BADCHARTS. Every time Explicit or I have reverted your edits, WP:BADCHARTS has been in the edit summary. Click on the link, and there's the list of bad charts. I really don't know any way to make it any clearer.

As for the list of good charts, it's at WP:GOODCHARTS.—Kww(talk) 03:40, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One Year Later

Its been over a year since you were last warned. Please be aware that Bulgaria is listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Please do not add it again like you did to Ride. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 13:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy Ride

Tell Me What Your Name Is

Please can you stop your unconstructive and incorrect edits. there are a number of references (official) which prove that the song is called "Tell Me What Your Name Is" and not "What Your Name Is".

Please see:

three credible sources and you have none to prove your point.

further more the personnel section is taken directly from the album's insert and therefore there is no need to change the producers.

(Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Disruptive Edits (May 2009)

This is the first and last time i will ask you to stop making disruptive changes to the article. Once a producer has been named once only their surname (and initial for disambiguative purposes) should be used afterwards. Furthermore i have used the billboard listing Billboard: Fantasy Ride to accredit producers and writers to songs. Please do not make further un-needed and un-purposeful revisions/edits. It would be appreciated if you could also include edit summaries and discuss your comments about the article on the discussion page. Currently your style of editing and method of inputting change (especially on Fantasy Ride) has been unhelpful.

If you continue to make disruptive edits you face being referred to administrators for WP:disruption and WP:edit warring (Lil-unique1 (talk) 17:27, 9 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

FINAL WARNING. STOP making revisions to producers and track-listings. your revisions are unsourced whereas the information i have provided is taken directly from Billboard Official Track-listing for Fantasy Ride. This is the third time i have spoken to you about your manor of editing. If you cannot and do not provide a source your edits will be revised to ones that can and do provide a source. You have now officially been warned after recieving several opportunities to clarify your edits (which you failed to do). If you make ANY further edits/revisions to Fantasy Ride without references you will be referred to wikipedia adminstrators and arbitration. You face being blocked from editing under wikipedia rules -- WP:disruption and WP:edit warring. The choice is yours, we can go to mediation or i will refer you to adminstrators for disruption. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:59, 10 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Sources

I must ask what are your sources for the article? i provided a reference (reliable and verfiable) from Billboard, but you deleted it from the article and also insisted on adding furher producers. What proof is there that Kuk Harrell has produced for Fantasy Ride and what evidence is there to support he has produced the tracks you claim he has? according to Wikipedia:Verifiability the burden of finding evidence to support your additons lies with you. You have so far failed to do so and so according to the rules any editor can challenege your revisions. I will take this opportunity to remind you that any unsourced information can and WILL be deleted from the article as it is a clear breach of wikipedia's rules and purpose. i can't make the case any clearer. I have notified administrators regarding your conduct and refusal to explain your revisions, but i do feel that in the past you have edited in WP:good faith (e.g. edits to Love Sex Magic, although not including the bad charts issue) WP:disruption and so i am giving you the chance to clarify your position. i must inform you that your edits have broken rules under WP:disruption and WP:Tendentious editing, i suggest you read them for further information (Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Response

You might have the album as i have the the album too (from itunes) the problem is that not all of the fans have the album and hence track-listing needs references. Billboard's listing is verifiable, your revisions to the article are not because there is not a source for non-album owning readers to verify the facts. do you see the point now? can you understand where the issue is? (Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Work/Third Single

Oh dear this is becomming oh too much of a habit, myself or another user having to point out factual inaccuracies in your edits. Ciara's twitter says "its time to go and 'work'" this in no way confirms the release of "work" as the third single. All that Twitter confirms is that ciara knows what her next single is and she met Melina to discuss the video for her as of yet undisclosed third single. Please wait until it specifically says "next single is...". Trying to foreshadow a single like this is a breach of wikipedia rules according to WP:crystal not to mention a factual inaccuracy.

I would like to draw your attention to several rule pages to prevent future messages like this. You seem to have trouble understanding how to use wikipedia accurately so take a look at: WP:Crystal,
*WP:albums,
*WP:verifiable,
*WP:notability,
*WP:good faith
this is also the third time you have been asked to provide a WP:edit summary please do not fail to do so again.(Lil-unique1 (talk) 17:52, 19 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Editing Style.

Hello, Please can i ask that in the interest of courtesy and for ease of understanding when making edits like you have done to Fantasy Ride can you provide an WP:edit summary. this helps other editors identify what changes have been made to articles. I know myself that sometimes i forget to do so, but it does make things easier for other users if you can provide a brief summary of the additions/deletions or changes you have made to an article. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Please in the future can you provide a WP:edit summary when making alterations like those you did to Fantasy Ride. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Bad charts: final warning

Despite your several warnings above, you've continued to add charts and using improper websites as sources that are strictly prohibited under WP:CHARTS#Websites to avoid and WP:BADCHARTS (diffs: [1], [2], [3]). This is your only and final warning. The next time you add any websites or charts clearly in violation of WP:CHARTS, you will be blocked from editing. (Automated note: Please make sure to reply here on your talk page, as I have it on my watchlist. Thank you.) — Σ xplicit 00:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Surgeoncover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Surgeoncover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Your editing behavior is a topic of discussion at at WP:ANI, which can be found here. — Σxplicit 19:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeatedly inserting unsuitable material into articles despite many warnings to stop, and for failing to address this with other editors when they've tried to communicate with you. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerene^talk 21:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To reviewing admin: please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Ldt88 07 and addition of WP:BADCHARTS. EyeSerene^talk 21:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Takinback.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Takinback.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 02:56, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Roulette (song)‎

Hello.
Concerning your edits regarding Russian Roulette (song)‎, there are two sources giving Rihanna co-writing credits for that song: 1 2. I don't know if it's true, and I personally assume that here contribution was minor in comparison, in particular since most sources only name Ne-Yo, but that's what we have. Unless there are sources explicitly disputing that claim, I think we need to list her. If you disagree, can I convince you to come to one of the relevant talk pages (Talk:Rihanna, Talk:Rated R (Rihanna album), or Talk:Russian Roulette (song)) and start a discussion about it?
Thanks, Amalthea 14:37, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BADCHARTS

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Never Ever (Ciara song). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. You've already been blocked for a month over this. You must stop adding charts listed at WP:BADCHARTS, specifically the Brazil Hot 100, to articles.—Kww(talk) 01:41, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Basic Instinct (album). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.

Also do not falsely claim that a citation proves something which not true. Nowhere in this source [4] does it state that 'Bangladesh' is working with Ciara. In future do not add unsourced information to any article on wikipedia and most definately do not' try to claim that a source says something when in reality it does not. Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:10, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Basic Instinct (album). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Only last month were you warned about not adding Bangladesh to the project as it was not supported in any of the existing sources nor has it been confirmed. Wikipedia is not simply a place were you can add things non-stop, recieve warnings then stop and then start adding again months later. There were serious issues with your editing on Fantasy Ride last year and you're doing the same again with her new album. I will not hesitate to issue these warnings. Please stop. Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:38, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Basic Instinct

Ok i'm sorry if i've been harsh. I too am a big ciara fan that's why im trying to protect the new album page from vandals to which there have been a lot. I have read it many times online but there is no source to support the claims that she's worked with Bangladesh. I've searched everywhere including magazines, reputable websites and her official channels but no mention of the producer. without a source it cannot and will not be added inline with WP:Verifiable. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad we've reached an understanding. However saying that Ciara met Bangladesh at Milk Studios and us having a source saying she worked at Milk Studios is not enough to be able to say Ciara worked with Bangladesh at Milk Studios. That would constitute original research which is not allowed. Sourcing sincerelyciara would also not be allowed as it is a fansite. p.s. could you please sign your comments on my talk page with ~~~~ otherwise they won't archive properly. Thanks. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:24, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok that's fair enough. If you want to add something to the article but are unsure if its appropriate just message me or write it on the article's talk page (i watch both) and then we can look at how to improve it and make it usable. With regards to whether you can speak about her working with Bangladesh unfortunately without a source saying that it happened we can prove that she actually ever planned to or did work with him. Also by signature i mean typing four tildes (~). When you type it, it looks like ~~~~. It need to be added to the end of every response you've left please. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still not quite right. the most important part is the time signature. Literally type ~ four times. (~~~~) or click the siganture & time button on the top tool bar (which looks like a pen and signature).Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]