User talk:Ldsnh2

Welcome!

Hello, Ldsnh2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Razorflame (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New York Radical Feminists

The tag that I placed on the article is a standard one that lets other users know that the article needs to be formatted to Wikipedia's guidelines (see Manual of Style). Articles in the Wikipedia look the same to make them easier to follow. This is no judgement on the research that went into the article. If you don't agree with the standard then you are free to bring up your concerns on the Manual of Style talk page. ... discospinster _talk 01:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can make the references the same size as the rest of the text, if that will help. ... discospinster _talk 23:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've done a good job expanding the article. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, feel free to ask me. ... discospinster _talk 00:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please stop removing the tags from New York Radical Feminists. You are way past three reverts on this point, and I'm not even changing any content. Your responses in article summaries are also inappropriate, and your constant references to me is not in good faith. If you remove the tags again, I'll seek administrator intervention. Shadowjams (talk) 22:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as New York Radical Feminists. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Peter G Werner (talk) 04:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, or by removal of content simply because it disagrees with your own personal views , as you did to New York Radical Feminists, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 16:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please start using the Talk page for New York Radical Feminists

It is very difficult to resolve any kind of dispute over "New York Radical Feminists" when you don't post your comments at Talk:New York Radical Feminists. You leave extensive commentary in the edit summaries, on other people's talk pages, and on your user page – everywhere but the talk page of the article itself which is where such things are supposed to be discussed. I'll be happy to discuss with you what I think is wrong with your prior contributions and your behavior toward editors, but if I'm going to discuss this at all, I'm going to discuss it in one place, rather than a dozen different corners of Wikipedia where you leave commentary. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 02:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

This is just a note to point out that rather than engage in an ongoing revert war with you, I've filed a complaint about your ongoing pattern of edit warring, disruptive editing, and personal attack here: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Ldsnh2_and_New_York_Radical_Feminists_.E2.80.93_ongoing_pattern_of_disruptive_editing. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 00:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See here as the link seems to be broken in some way. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ldsnh2 deleted

I've deleted your user pages as an inappropriate attack page. There are limitations to what is allowable on your user pages, and attacking people with it are not allowed. Do not do it again or you will be blocked. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page comments

I've removed two sections of your comments at Talk:New York Radical Feminists as further attacks in violation of our talk page guidelines. Please also see our civility policy. Now, what exactly did you mean in this section about potential future copyright concerns? Be careful because we have a very strong policy against legal threats. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've also restored your comments at the talk page. It makes the entire discussion a mess if you withdraw every comment you make. Your comments are there for now. If you actually want to discuss things, we can actually do that. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Report me to whoever, block me, ban me,, edit out things I write, edit back in things I delete, write assumptions about how you think I think or feel, question my integrity, knowledge, research work, experience, whatever you want to do, whoever you are, just do it. I do not care. Good luck to you.Ldsnh2 (talk) 02:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

I'm going to assume that User:71.139.157.194 (clearly you from this) was just you forgetting to log in and this was not an attempt to avoid scrutiny over your editing. Now, do that again in violation of our policy on sock puppetry and you'll be blocked. I don't care for your soapbox. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Block me ban me, report me, do whatever you want. I do not care! Period.Ldsnh2 (talk) 02:15, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back...

Please stop removing content (blanking) from Radical feminism without discussion or explanation. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The piece was not written with any discussion with any radical feminists was it? So why did you write that? And why did you put back my external links about New York Radical Feminists on archive.org for the New York Radical Feminist and Radical Feminism article that were deleted today for copyright reasons with no discussion with me. Follow your own rules dominating Wikiguy.

I didn't write that piece. But discuss on the talk page if you think it should be removed. As for the links, deadlinks should be removed. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]