User talk:Lb254613

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, Lb254613, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.We're so glad you're here! Matthewvetter (talk) 17:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

J.K. Rowling

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._K._Rowling#Views

1. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?

    Yes, the ones that I checked were backed up with good references.

2. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

   I think everything is relevant. There is a lot of information on Harry Potter but that is also what made her famous, however there is still good information about her past.

3. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

   I believe that the article is neutral. The article gives good information about J.K. Rowling, the only thing is that in certain areas it tells us how she felt and that could be portrayed as obviously connecting to her feelings.

4. Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that biased noted?

   There is information from news sites, interviews, and some even secondary sources from personally written pages.

5. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

   I think that it is just right. I wasn't overwhelmed trying to read the article and I felt that I got the information I was looking for in the article.

6. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?

   The links that I checked worked, and I didn't see any paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article. Everything was properly cited.

7. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

   Every thing that I read was up to date. They had her most recent books that she has written up to 2014. Some interviews were from the past but I feel they are still relevant to the page.

Lb254613 (talk) 17:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Lauren Bradford[reply]