User talk:Lazypub

01/15/2019

User Lazypub (that's me) is taking a step back across all wikipedia. I will still be editing, but not as active. Lazypub (talk)

06-10-2019

I don't need this crap.

=====================================================================================================

Welcome!

Hello, Lazypub, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Threatin. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Widefox; talk 20:14, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Widefox. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Threatin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Widefox; talk 20:16, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of Living Persons

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Nick (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

there's no reason to cyber stalk me on to Wikipedia where you "have authority", just because I called you out on your uncivil tone on Wikidata where you have no authority. Totally uncalled for. Lazypub (talk) 20:40, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When I noticed your incompetence on Wikidata, I had a quick check of your contributions here, and I see you've been making a large number of edits to Biographies of Living People without adding sources (for which someone else has warned you previously). I thought it would be sensible to warn you that such behaviour can result in your account being sanctioned (though not by me, since I'd consider myself already involved). Nick (talk) 20:47, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jin Jin (musician), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:25, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noneof yourbusiness48, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Cjhard (talk) 03:12, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Noneof yourbusiness48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]