Jump to content

User talk:Lazy Maniik/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hindi literature encyclopedia moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Hindi literature encyclopedia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 13:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History of Modern Hindi Poetry moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, History of Modern Hindi Poetry, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:31, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Modern Hindi Poetry (June 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iflaq was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
signed, Iflaq (talk) 14:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, MXX8! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! signed, Iflaq (talk) 14:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hindi literature encyclopedia (June 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it will almost certainly be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a partial block may be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft does not provide information needed to satisfy book notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 14:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Linguistics Dictionary moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Linguistics Dictionary, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 18:18, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bharatendu Era moved to draftspace

[edit]

I've moved your article Bharatendu Era to draftspace. This is because the article currently does not have sufficient reliable sources to remain published. Please make sure to read our guideline on reliable sources. Once your article has sufficient sourcing, feel free to submit it for review, or if you are confident, move it back to its original location. If you have any questions or would like any help, feel free to contact me! Elli (talk | contribs) 22:23, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prem Narayan Shukla moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Prem Narayan Shukla, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jupitus Smart 17:19, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karnes (poet) (June 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources are not available for me to review, but the prose needs serious attention to make it understandable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 23:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Balakrishna Bhatt moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Balakrishna Bhatt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 04:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Srikrishnabhatta Kavikalanidhi moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Srikrishnabhatta Kavikalanidhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 11:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andheri Nagari

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andheri Nagari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Supadmavyākaraṇa

[edit]

Thank you for creating Supadmavyākaraṇa. A couple of points:

  • Please show the date of this book - ancient or modern?
  • You apparently consulted your reference next month. Please check and correct the "Access-date".

Thanks. PamD 07:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,@PamD: welcome In My knowledge I have no idea more information related to this topic When I Created this article, I did not know that questions will be asked about this article.In my opinion the option is correct is ancient.Ok I Correct acess date immediately.Sorry about that.

Best Regards. ❣Serious Black@Contribute 09:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • But when you add information to the encyclopedia and cite a reference, with an access date, you are saying "I looked at this source on this date and it supports the information I have added to the encyclopedia". If you can't honestly do this, don't add the information to the encyclopedia. PamD 10:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PamD: I'm Sorry about that because I 'm New editor on wikipedia.I am not much interested in studying Sanskrit Subject .I do not say that I do not know about this article but I do not know much about this topic.But the references I have put, I have put myself and not stolen from any other wiki, I take responsibility for that reference.i want to learn a lot from you will you help me.

Best regards. ❣Serious Black@Contribute 10:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Arun Kamal

[edit]

Hello, MXX8,

Thank you for creating Arun Kamal.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add another reliable source for verification.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|1TWO3Writer}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

1TWO3Writer (talk) 13:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@1TWO3Writer: Welcome Ok I add more ref in Arun Kamal in few days. ✨️Serious Black@Contribute 03:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meeting

[edit]

Hey bro good to see uh I am also a biology student of class12. I want to contact with uh Urwisher (talk) 16:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Urwisher: Splendid,I will be glad to meet you. Best Regards Serious Black@Contribute 02:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Translating from other language Wikis

[edit]

Hi MXX8. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for writing article in the field of Indian literature. I noticed that you are translating articles from Hindi Wikipedia. In this case, you need to provide attribution in the summary for the edit that copies the work. This is a copyright issue and must be done. You should go through all the translations that you've made and add a {{translated page}} template to their talk pages. For more information, see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia#Translating from other language Wikimedia projects. Feel free to ask me if you need any help in editing. --Gazal world (talk) 21:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, :@Gazal world: What kind of attribution to provide can me please give some examples in the summary and if possible help me to improve Bund Aur Samudar , I've add {{translated page}} in Our talk page. Best Regards Serious Black@Contribute 02:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Siddhamangal Stotra moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Siddhamangal Stotra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jupitus Smart 16:52, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meri ikyaavan kavitaen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collection. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hallo, Thank you for creating Sunita (novel). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Sunita ), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 07:38, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: I will take full care that such mistakes do not happen again.Best Regards

Serious Black@Contribute 09:07, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

[edit]

Please don't invent names for categories, as you did with Sunita (novel). If a category doesn't exist, find one which does. Thanks. PamD 07:39, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: I will take full care that such mistakes do not happen again.Best Regards

Serious Black@Contribute 09:07, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Laplorfill. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mini Menon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read, and follow, WP:OVERLINK. Thanks, Laplorfill (talk) 06:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Laplorfill: Thanks for this Information and I will take full care that such mistakes do not happen again.Best Regards.

❣MXX8❣@Talk

Sunita (novel) hatnote

[edit]

I "thanked" you by accident, while meaning to revert the edit. There is no need for the hatnote on the disambiguated page, as a reader won't get there unless they choose that title. PamD 06:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: Thanks for this Information. Best Regards

❣MXX8❣@Talk 13:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism (magazine) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Criticism (magazine), is an advertisement and not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 11:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @GermanKity: thanks for this Action I'm Your fan. Best Regards

❣MXX8❣@Talk 11:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate Page Name

[edit]

It seems the page name "Kolayt Lake" seems wrong. Correct page name should be "Kolayat Lake". Thank you! __Dhwanil07 (talk) 13:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,@Dhwanil07:, Already done by :@Eostrix and Thanks for informed me.Best Regards

❣MXX8❣@Talk 15:52, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

[edit]

I'm not sure if you're familiar, but we have some guidelines on custom signatures at WP:CUSTOMSIG. Signatures should not make it difficult to identify your username, and should not contain images. It's also best to try to avoid disrupting how text around your signature displays (such as by increasing the line height, as the image in yours is currently doing). It also contains some recommendations on choosing colors so as not to make it more difficult for visually impaired users to read your name.

Would you mind updating your signature to align with those recommendations? Thanks. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:28, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I've Change our Signature.Best Regards ~~8@Talk✍️ 02:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

When copying text from another source, making trivial changes to the wording, while keeping sufficiently close to the original to make it perfectly clear that it is substantially a copy, is not enough to prevent it being an infringement of copyright. For example, if a source says "Many veterans contributed towards the standardization of Hindi spelling, among which..." and you replace it with "Many stalwarts contributed towards the standardization of Hindi spelling, among which...", anybody can see that you have copied the text. Likewise, copying a sentence word for word except for substituting "typewriter" for "typing machine" does not stop the copying from infringing copyright, and similarly for all the other trivial changes you made. Don't copy text from elsewhere and change it to try to avoid copyright violation: write material in your own words from the start. JBW (talk) 15:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JBW,Forgive me sir, I am very sorry for this mistake, I will not do any such mistake in future.Standard Hindi Spelling Article is translated into Hindi.Best Regards MXX8Talk✍️ 03:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Care with edit summaries and talk page messages

[edit]

Please be careful with edit summaries. In this edit you gave an edit summary suggesting that you were reverting "Unexplained content removal ", but in fact the edit you reverted did not remove any content. Even more importantly, be careful that talk page messages correctly relate to the editing they refer to, especially if you are posting to new editors, or IP editors who may be new. At User talk:50.40.224.170 you said "I noticed that you recently removed content from Talk:Greenwashing without adequately explaining why", but the editor had not removed anything from that page. JBW (talk) 15:56, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lazy_Maniik/Archive_1&oldid=1047553470"