User talk:Lawrenjk

This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Georgia_Institute_of_Technology/Biogeochemical_Cycles_(Spring_2019) .

Welcome!

Hello, Lawrenjk, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Michele Judd moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Michele Judd. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I would like the address the issues with this article. Can you elaborate on the possible conflict of interest? Lawrenjk (talk) 23:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your pattern of editing thus far suggests that you have some sort of connection or relationship to Michele Judd; please review WP:COI and disclose any pertinent conflicts of interest before resubmiting the article for review. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I have participated in a Keck Institute workshop in the past, but have no continuing personal or professional ties to the institute or their directors. The addition of a page for Michele Judd was prompted by news of her impending retirement. I will disclose this fact on the talk page prior to re-submission. Thank you Lawrenjk (talk) 14:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I believe I have addressed all concerns and have re-submitted the page for review! Lawrenjk (talk) 15:19, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Your edit to Draft:Michele Judd has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michele Judd (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The cited sources are entry in databases, publications that the subject took part in the creation of, and profile in organization that she is a part of, none of which are suitable for demonstrating notability. Please make sure to include multiple significant coverage from reliable and independent sources to show that the subject passes WP:NBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michele Judd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 22:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lawrenjk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tutwakhamoe (talk) 22:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michele Judd (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ortizesp was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the references in the page are about Michele Judd herself and her noteability, this does not pass WP:GNG in current state.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michele Judd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ortizesp (talk) 05:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Michele Judd

Hello, Lawrenjk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michele Judd, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]