User talk:Lawman8

Welcome!

Hello, Lawman8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! __meco 06:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dereks1x

You wouldn't happen to be a sockpuppet of Dereks1x (talk · contribs), would you? Your edit summary, edit on Barack Obama,[1] and the comment you left on the talk page[2] are remarkably similar to edits by this banned user. If you are Dereks1x, please stop editing immediately, if not.. Your editing on the article will be difficult for awhile — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobblehead (talk • contribs)

I admire Bobblehead's fairness, but I am not even going to bother to ask who you are, because it is so apparent. But here's some advice: you would do better using your energies on something constructive and positive, rather than just creating work for other people. And your disingenuous comments on user's talk pages don't work. Tvoz |talk 19:15, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well.. Guess we'll find out if you are a sockpuppet or not. Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dereks1x --Bobblehead 21:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to file an RFCU against me, Jersyko, and Tvoz, please go to WP:RFCU and follow the instructions there. The Dereks1x request is only for suspected sockpuppets of Dereks1x. --Bobblehead 23:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed by jpgordon. Tvoz |talk 00:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barack Obama. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you.--Bobblehead 20:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting is undoing the actions of another editor, this includes attempting to find "compromise" wording. It is always preferable to discuss edits on the talk page. If you'd like you can even post your "preferred" wording on the talk page and discuss the wording there rather than doing it on the article itself. --Bobblehead 20:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption warning

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dereks1x. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

If you want to start a checkuser request and can do so in good faith, start another one. Do not, however, continue to disrupt the current request made by Bobblehead. · j e r s y k o talk · 21:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

You are a sockpuppet.--Anthony.bradbury 01:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]