User talk:LawAndOther

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of DavidYork71 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LawAndOther (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No appropriateness to victimising for supplying checkable sources and expressing opinions in discussion.

Decline reason:

Sorry, you are not welcome to edit here, particularly since you are so committed to adding information without appropriate sources (despite your claims otherwise). Gwernol 11:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.