User talk:Lavenderly

Welcome to Wikipedia

Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.

Main Introduction — What is Wikipedia?
Wikipedia:A Primer for newcomers — A good starting point.
The Five Pillars — What are the principles behind Wikipedia?
Quick Introductions to:

Policies and guidelines — How does Wikipedia actually work?
Talk pages — How do I communicate in Wikipedia?
Referencing — How do I add sources to articles?
Uploading images — How do I add and use images?
Navigating Wikipedia — How do I find my way around?

What Wikipedia is not - even though everyone can edit it, Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the many help pages.

Google: Wikipedia is very well indexed by Google. Searching for a term, even about an editing question, followed by "wiki" or "wikipedia" usually pulls up what you need.

Where next?

Check out Help:Watching pages. Your own Watchlist can become your favorite place to visit.
If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page or the Wikipedia:Teahouse page could be your next stop!

Jane Hirshfield

Why did you remove a paragraph of information from the Jane Hirshfield article? Helpsome (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did so at the request of Ms. Hirshfield, who wrote me that not only does she want to minimize her religious practice on the page (see the reference to her comments further down her wiki page) but that the anecdotes were "garbled" and not quoted accurately from the citation source. Lavenderly (talk) 14:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Lavenderly[reply]

Women poets etc.

Category:Women poets is not new, it has existed since 2007. Category:American women poets has existed since last fall. The same is true of Category:American women novelists. If people do not think we should have such categories they are free to nominate them for deletion at CfD. It is not difficult.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will make this easy for you. If there is a category you do not like copy and paste this

This category is being considered for deletion.

This does not mean that any of the pages in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized.
Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Please do not empty the category or remove this notice while the discussion is in progress.
add entry: {{subst:cfd2|Lavenderly|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}

Administrators: If this category is empty, and all incoming links have been cleaned up, click here to delete.

Onto the category page, making sure that you have the date right. Then follow the link created to CfD, and explain your reasons.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Susanne Antonetta may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:56, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advice sought on quality of poet pages as well as notability

Hi Spanglej. You've been helpful to me in the past and I'm unable to post this in the Teahouse (cannot hit the "submit" button on the dialogue box there.) I'm looking for guidance.I did an extensive update on Jane Hirshfield's page, including correct citations to all her publications as well as to literary criticism which discusses her work. Now I see someone has marked her page as "start" quality. I disagree. I'm also wondering how to go about establishing notability. Hirshfield is one of the world's most famous and esteemed living poets, yet there remains a question as to her notability?

I've also updated another poet/editor's page (Sarah Gorham) and am a little surprised to see her notability questioned. She's a very well know poet and essayist, also runs an awardwinning American literary publishing house. Can you help?

Hi Lavender, thanks for your message. I am on a long wikibreak; apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Hirshfield's page is now marked as a C class, which is probably appropriate as it hasn't been closely edited to meet the WP guidelines. I think her notability is not in question as multiple strong citations are given. Gorham's tags were added three years ago and do not seem to apply any more (if they ever did) as notability is established by citations. I have removed them and cleaned up the page a bit. As a note to your above discussion re Hirshfield, biographical pages can be changed if proof of error is given. The subject can make comments on the article talk page, but shaping actual content would count as conflict of interest editing. Please read the guideline on why it is discouraged for subjects and those that know them to edit articles. If Hirshfield wish to correct a major error on the page, she can contact the Wikipedia Foundation via the OTRS team, by email. I hope that's helpful. Happy editing and best wishes. Span (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your reply a great deal, Spanglej. Thank you. Lavenderly (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Lavenderly[reply]

Your submission at AfC Alice Mattison was accepted

Alice Mattison, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~KvnG 13:35, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]