User talk:Lavath

Notability of Lou lancaster

A tag has been placed on Lou lancaster requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Seascic ^T/_C 17:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lou lancaster, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lou Lancaster Deletion before the article was even finsihed, I added the 'hang on' tag but it was removed before I was allowed to explain in discussion

Lancaster

Sorry about that; we deal with a LOT of crap on a daily basis, and occasionally there's a false positive.

Here's the thing. What you had for the article... it didn't really assert notability. It didn't really say much about why anyone should care about Lou Lancaster. Since you ran his official website, you may not have been the most impartial person in the world to make the decision.

On the other hand... he performed at the Magic Castle eighteen times? Whoa.

I'm going to restore the article, and fix it up a bit so as to more clearly show why he should be mentioned. DS (talk) 14:48, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help given to me, a true newbie...

Thanks for your help! I hope you might be able to help me further. Before I ask I want to state that I do not truly run the Lou Lancaster site, but the server the site is on is one of the machines that I admin. I did a small amount of work on the site because magicians and the owner of the server asked me to. Now to my question :) I was invited to the wake of Mr. Lou Lancaster, well they call it a Broken Wand ceremony. In this meeting famous magicians attented and Lou turned out to be pretty much the best slight of hand close up magician in memory. That was agreed upon in general. However, specifically the famous Magician; Jeff McBride stated some things about Lou that seem to me to be truly noteworthy such as Lou taught him and showed many techniques to him that he uses to this day. This was usual for Lou; he was really that good and everybody knew him but he never got the money or huge fame. He taught Mohammed Ali the ways of Magic. He created some set pieces of illusion such as the "Twister Illusion" and a version of "Dissapearing Cage" I uploaded the broken wand ceremony video to youtube, also a slide show I put together under direction of the executor of Lou's estate. Please could you tell me if this content and the statements Mr. McBride makes, for instance (in the Broken Wand video), would merit Lou's acticle becoming officially 'noteworthy'? I also have Lou's resume from the 1970's and permission to use any/all media on Lou/from Lou to use as I wish - the resume shows Lou being on TV several times would this help to establish noteworthyness?

The Broken Wand media: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKqaifYC-Pg

Thanks, Lavath.

File copyright problem with File:McGuff Company Inc.png

Thank you for uploading File:McGuff Company Inc.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 00:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think I have edited the image's tags in a sufficient manner?

I copied the style of an existing example File WesternDigitalLogo

Orphaned non-free image (File:McGuff Company Inc.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:McGuff Company Inc.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image is and has been in use

Hi. Using the image for an article. The article is being created. The wikipedia guidelines say not to rush, but to make the article better, not faster. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lavath/MyTestMcGuff is where the image is in use. ...So it has been in use and is currently in use, thank you.

Non-free images such as logos are not allowed to remain indefinitely in non-article space (such as user-space "sandboxes"). If & when you think that the article is worthy of being placed in the mainspace, you can either re-upload the image or ask any sysop/admin to restore the image for placement on the article. Also, you need to let someone know that you're talking back to them on your own talk page, with something like {{talkback}}, as most editors don't watch every talk page they edit. Skier Dude (talk) 02:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore Image

Howdy, Skier Dude I, a newbie and others are trying our hands at each creating a new wikipedia article. The focus is on proper referencing. I am ready to show mine to them, could I please have the image back on or about Monday, Dec. 21, 2009? After they help me proof it (a couple of days at most), I would like very much to make the article live - I am sure to get critical feedback after thie, but hope that with prep work my required revisions will be minimal, or at least less than theirs. So please be so good as to restore the image! (plus I forgot how I made the image tags.) Thanks for letting me know about the talkback tags Lavath (talk) 00:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the image, it will be up for another week for your use. If it is restored to article space, make sure the deletion template is removed from the image and the correct article name (backlink) is on the "fair use" template" Skier Dude (talk)

Hello again, Skier Dude. I thank you for your help, and ask for more help! I have attempted to follow your suggestions.

1. I have named the article "McGuffCompanies" but am unsure if "McGuff_Companies" would be more proper.

2. I updated the image tag, but am unsure if I have done so correctly.

3. I do not think that I am able to "make sure the deletion template is removed from the image" I do not think my access is sufficient to allow this.

I do not lightly ask all this mess of questions of you! I have spent much time attempting to research and find the answers myself. I ask you the questions to which I was unable to find answers for. Thank you, and I appreciate any help you are willing and able to provide me!

page is at:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGuffCompanies

Lavath (talk) 19:32, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the article to McGuff Companies and the image tag has been updated to match the correct article title. Skier Dude (talk) 03:15, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:MrLouLancaster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MrLouLancaster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:09, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ESkog, I have complied, please note:

Regarding the image: “MrLouLancaster.jpg” for Wikipedia uploaded at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MrLouLancaster.jpg

The original image is located at http://www.loulancaster.com/MrLouLancaster.jpg

Please find the permission text located on Mr. Lancaster’s site at the following link: http://www.loulancaster.com/index.htm

Here is a copy of the text in question: The image, "MrLouLancaster.jpg" is released to the public domain for any purpose provided the photo is not modified and the website http://www.loulancaster.com/ is included as a visible reference.

Lavath (talk) 18:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]