User talk:Lauriwriter

Oh. What's wrong this time?

Category:Windows XP typefaces

And now, please! Don't remove the category Windows XP typefaces, because I spent really much time for that. I am sorry, that I made some mini stubs.

Lauriwriter 15:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Modern

I have edited your addition to Modern because the style guidelines for disambiguation pages are different to those for other pages, see MOS:D for more details. Thanks, Rich257 15:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks, that you didn't delete the whole page. xD Lauriwriter 11:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:SISlogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:SISlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Script (typeface)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Script (typeface), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Small Fonts

The article Small Fonts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

two sentence article with no content or references and no indication of notability that has been notability tagged since feburary. Google sea returns no indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajbpearce (talk) 16:49, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of APP (file format)

The article APP (file format) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not only fails WP:GNG, but also tries to cover several independent topics at once for an obscure file format. In effect, this article is inherently WP:IINFO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Lauriwriter. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Lauriwriter~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

HTTP USER AGENT listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HTTP USER AGENT. Since you had some involvement with the HTTP USER AGENT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 07:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]