User talk:LaurensRS

Hi, Please type responses in the Talk:Shroud of Turin page so it will be centralized. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi History -- did your comment on the Schwartz bio. talk page where I mention the Shroud mean something beyond what I've done? Lillian's bio. and her work on the Shroud, as factually expressed on the bio. talk page, may be related to your article, but I also 'talked' to you about the correction for your article. Her bio. is completely separate from your article just as it is separate from articles on Bell Labs. Best.LaurensRS (talk) 17:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)LaurensRS[reply]

I did not comment on the bio page, given that I do not know her work, I just removed an image that was non-representative of the subject of the article, as you had also suggested. However, I will briefly comment there now. History2007 (talk) 17:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ken Knowlton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

in her home studio. In 1969, AT&T commissioned Schwartz to do an animated film, Pixillation (thus, fn. 2 is completely wrong]. The film is 98% hand animation wherein Schwartz, at her home studio, poured different liquids

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Simón Bolívar. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Transcendental (talk) 19:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]