User talk:LaurensAllende

April 2024

Please do not add information to wikipedia without references, see our policies, WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:RS. Unreferenced information may be deleted at any time. - Altenmann >talk 13:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

?? эй чувак. Ты вообще в своем уме? че скидиваешь ерунду? LaurensAllende (talk) 10:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second warning. Please do not add information without providing references as you did in History of Mongolia - Altenmann >talk 00:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'm new and just put some common knowledge stuff in central asian history, you reverted again? But never mind. Btw, how about yourself? I see you add and create thousands without reference. Good luck and try to use reference yourself. LaurensAllende (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LaurensAllende! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 10:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks. I'll note it. I'm new. That's why. LaurensAllende (talk) 12:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sednaya Prison. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Altenmann >talk 19:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Torture in the State of Palestine, you may be blocked from editing. - Altenmann >talk 19:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Да ладно. Бог с тобой. Иди. LaurensAllende (talk) 19:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use English in English Wikipedia.- Altenmann >talk 21:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hi LaurensAllende! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Xiongnu several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Xiongnu, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I thought that user reverting everything was a vandal. That's why I reverted his unsourced revisions. LaurensAllende (talk) 22:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And this? I've just protected the page since neither of you seem able to listen when it comes to policies around edit warring. If the behavior continues, account blocks are likely. See Wikipedia:Edit warring for more detail. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've got to be kidding me, now you're edit warring at a different article? Please consider this your final warning to stop reverting and discuss changes first. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You tell that to that touch whatever user, directing everything to "turkic". No turkic, no history simply. LaurensAllende (talk) 22:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have warned both of you about edit warring. If you can't follow policy because "they started it", I question your capacity to be editing at all. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 22:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]