User talk:Lauramcintosh2905

Welcome!

Hello, Lauramcintoshbannatyne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Bannatyne's, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 09:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm 331dot. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bannatyne's because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bannatyne

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Lauramcintoshbannatyne (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown.

Hi, I have requested a username change as I did not know about this. Please can I speak to you about the content I have submitted about this page? I am of course happy to have any of it proofed if it is too promotional.

Thanks, Lauramcintoshbannatyne (talk) 10:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest visiting the welcome links above. SwisterTwister talk 20:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Thanks for requesting the username change; it has already taken place. I assume you are asking about Bannatyne's. That article's tone indeed was unduly promotional. Just to give a few random examples:

... founded by famous Scottish businessman...
... clubs consist of the latest state-of-the-art Technogym equipment...
... a luxurious swimming pool...
... a wide selection of nutritional meals, snacks and drinks...
... spacious therapy rooms providing luxurious treatments...

and my personal favourite,

Terms and conditions apply.

Would you expect to read something like that in the Encyclopaedia Britannica? I don't think it's the tone used by independent sources to report on the company, either, but unfortunately I can't tell because the article didn't cite any independent sources in the first place. It would need to be rewritten in its entirety to become a valid encyclopedia article, particularly in order to conform to Wikipedia's required neutral point of view. You may want to check out our guidelines on reliable sources, verifiability, and notability of companies. If you then think you can write a neutral, well-sourced article about your company, I'd advise you to use the Article Wizard to write a draft and to submit it for a review by an experienced editor. The old page, however, read like something written by the company's PR people, not like an encyclopedia article, and satisfied the criteria for speedy deletion as a blatant advertisement. Huon (talk) 20:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bannatyne's (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bannatyne's and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 15:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Lauramcintosh2905, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 333 -blue 15:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bannatyne's (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability is not inherited- just because they're owned by Duncan Bannatyne, it doesn't make it notable. Most of the sources here are mainly about him rather than the fitness club.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bannatyne's and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Joseph2302 (talk) 20:53, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lauramcintosh2905. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lauramcintosh2905. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lauramcintosh2905|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.