User talk:Lauralee99

Tim Kelsey

Hi Laralee99, you did remove two references, and did not indicate why you did so. Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 21:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Scroll down and you will see when I rollbacked your edit that references were added back. However I have reverted to last revision by you. Happy editing! Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 21:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask on my talk page. Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 21:45, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lauralee99, have removed your amendment to Kelsey in relation to NAO report because this is a page about a living person - check wiki guidance - and the summary facts are inaccurate - the report criticised the NHS Information Centre for choosing not to tender the investment in Dr Foster. It did not criticise Dr Foster itself or Kelsey. Also inaccurate to say this was Kelsey's company: he was a minority shareholder in Dr Foster at the time. Have included a reference to the NAO report in the body of the text making it clear that the public body was the one criticised. Hulyaonal30 (talk) 11:11, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hulyaonal30, my amendment does not say that the report criticises Dr Foster or Kelsey. Specifically, it says:

"The acquisition of Kelsey's company, Dr Foster, by the Department of Health was later strongly criticised..."
"The circumstances of the £12m joint venture between Dr Foster, the company co-founded by Tim Kelsey, and the Department of Health, were criticised..."
"The acquisition was also strongly criticised by the Public Accounts Committee..."

These are verifiable facts. A Wikipedia editor has rolled back your changes.

I've removed the reference to "Kelsey's company" from the introduction, though as he was the co-founder, the description does not seem unreasonable to me. Lauralee99 (talk) 13:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]