User talk:Laura Clacey

Welcome!

Hello, Laura Clacey, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sxollie Cider, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Specto73 (talk) 11:09, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sxollie Cider

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sxollie Cider requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Specto73 (talk) 11:09, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, Laura Clacey, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Gdparkinson (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 09:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Cabayi - that was most certainly not my intention. Gdparkinson (talk · contribs) - fan our cider and someone I have never met was helping me to get our page uploaded as I am new to Wikipedia editing. I am trying to unblock the "Speedy Deletion" as we believe our article should exist within Wikipedia. We have won many awards and are the best cider in Africa... many other similar international brands with a smaller following are listed. Could you please assist? Laura Clacey (talk) 09:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Laura Clacey you evidently work for this cider company as you mention above. conflict of interest is very strongly discouraged and you must make a full disclosure on your user page as per WP:DISCLOSURE policy. --Domdeparis (talk) 10:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laura, if you were here to contribute to Wikipedia I'd happily take the time to help you out. However, you're just here to advertise your cider. I have no interest in working as an unpaid copywriter for your company. So, No. Cabayi (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Laura Clacey. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Sxollie Cider, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Domdeparis (talk) 10:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Laura Clacey, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Cabayi (talk) 11:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may have initially come here in good faith, sincerely thinking that Wikipedia was a free web host that could be used for the purpose of publicising a company's products, so denying that you had any bad-faith intention would be plausible, but to deny that publicising and promoting the company's products was your purpose is absurd. Any one who has read the page you created can see that it was full of praise for the company's cider. You may well have come in response to a request on Facebook for people to create a Wikipedia article in order to publicise this product. If so, you were, unfortunately, misled about the nature of Wikipedia. You are very welcome to start contributing to the encyclopaedia in other ways, neutrally and without promoting anything, but if your only purpose is to post a promotional page about this cider, whether in order to gain a hamper of cider, in order to publicise something you personally like, because you are paid to do it, or for any other reason, then Wikipedia is not the right place to do it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JamesBWatson,the version of the article in the meatpuppet's sandbox identifies Laura as the company's founder and the donor of the hamper, not a hopeful contestant. Cabayi (talk) 11:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JamesBWatson, Cabayi - I honestly did this in good faith and had no idea that I had violated the COI guidelines. I have never pretended to be anything other than the owner of the brand that thought it would be awesome to get a mention on Wikipedia given the hard work we have put in, and that many of our international competitors have exactly the same things written. I did post something on Facebook to assist us in this cause as we like to get the community involved in our brand, again not realising that this was against Wikipedia - I knew I could't write it myself as my wiki page I wrote in August was removed when I did, so I thought someone else could write it for me - that was my interpretation from reading "writing your first article". I had no idea I would be accused of sockpuppetry (which I am still trying to figure out what that means). I am clearly mistaken about what Wikipedia is trying to do as I use it personally to find out about other companies and what they do, who owns what and where they are based. I have of course removed the post from our Facebook page and have no intention of EVER contributing to wikipedia again after this debacle.

Have a lovely day, and perhaps in future - you could be a little nicer to the small guys out there who are just trying to make it out there. Laura Clacey (talk) 12:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't take it personally Laura you misunderstood what wikipedia is about to start off with, a lot of people do... but when the page was deleted with an explanation in August you tried to hustle and work round this by creating a competition and that is not how it works. Wikipedia is neutral it's an encyclopedia where you can find information about notable subjects it is not free publicity and you were trying to use it for that. It's not there to help small guys who are trying to make it, it is not philanthropic wikipedia is not a business angel. There is a policy of not biting a newcomer but when someone deliberately tries to hustle to get past the policies the other editors get a bit bitey...Domdeparis (talk) 14:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I started my message by acknowledging that you were likely to have come here in good faith, not knowing that using Wikipedia to advertise a business would be regarded as unacceptable. I made a point of inviting you to contribute in other ways. I tried to make it clear that I was not blaming you for your mistake, just explaining to you that what you did was not within Wikipedia's policies. From the tone of your last message Perhaps I did not succeed. I am sorry about that. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laura, I have just seen your post to the sockpuppet investigation page, where you thanked me "a 1000 times over", so maybe I didn't do such a bad job of showing that I accepted you were acting in good faith, after all. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]