User talk:Latishk007
Latishk007, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Latishk007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC) |
File permission problem with File:Veebha anand.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Veebha anand.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:18, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
[edit]
Hello Latishk007. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Divay Dhamija, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Latishk007. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Latishk007|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Azkord (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Unblock
[edit]
Latishk007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi reviewing admin i am Latish Kumar from India a newbie wikipedian and i don't know much of the rules of wikipedia and i did few mistakes while editing to the close whom i know but i have not used my account for promotional purpose and from today i will use it to make wikipedia better with some helpful and useful edits by learning. i humbly request you to unblock me. Latishk007 (talk) 07:29, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As you have almost exclusively edited about Indian actors and actresses, and state that you are being paid for your edits, I must conclude that you are indeed here to promote or publicize your clients. That will not be permitted as a conflict of interest. If you want to edit about subjects other than actors or entertainment, please state what those subjects might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:49, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Deletion pending for File:Veebha anand.jpg
[edit]Hello, Latishk007. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Veebha anand.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS received}}, indicating that a statement of permission had been received by permissions-en
wikimedia.org, but that this email was insufficient in some way
This could be due to any of several issues:
- The OTRS agent might have asked for further information to validate the ticket, but no follow-up reply was received (this is the most common reason).
- The license submitted might not have provided an acceptable free content license. (Statements of permission that allow only usage on Wikipedia or only non-commercial usage are NOT sufficient.)
- The person who submitted the statement of permission might not be the copyright holder or might not have been able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the OTRS agent that they own the copyright.
Due to privacy reasons, we cannot comment on Wikipedia with the exact reason that the ticket could not be processed.
- If YOU submitted the ticket to the permissions address, please search your email for a reply with the ticket ID - a reply was sent some time ago requesting more information or further actions needed to confirm permission. Please reply to that message.
- If the copyright holder (not you) submitted the ticket, then that person received a response (which may have been some time ago). Please ask them to follow up.
If another message is sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.
- If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en
wikimedia.org that resolves the problem, please let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.
If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 13:00, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
