User talk:Latifa Raafat

Suggestion

Per WP:RS we prefer review articles such as this one [1] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Latifa Raafat

I think this is a sock puppet id which tries to vandalize articles such as this one and most of all these. I have requested an investigation Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Latifa Raafat here. Sharif uddin (talk) 18:52, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am surprised by this accusation. I removed unsourced WP:OR from Hindu–Islamic relations. You, the accuser User:Sharif uddin, have reverted the article back to a version with the following tags,

This section possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (November 2010)

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2010)

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay that states the Wikipedia editor's particular feelings about a topic, rather than the opinions of experts. (October 2014)

etc.

Clearly, 4+ years cite request wait for WP:V sources is enough, and the tags state "unsourced materials and original research should be removed". For my edit, I left the following edit summary, "remove OR, remove personal essay, unsupported text with cite pending request for years, this article needs major overhall."

Peruse WP:NRSNVNA, where different members of wiki community and Jimbo Wales suggest,

To ensure verifiability, the presence of cited reliable sources in articles is non-negotiable. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and we are encyclopedists. We are not compilers of personal knowledge, we are compilers of published information.

I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative "I heard it somewhere" pseudo information is to be tagged with a "needs a cite" tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. – Jimbo Wales, 16 May 2006

Instead of bad faith accusations, help me improve that article by citing sources, and replacing OR with better content. Latifa Raafat (talk) 18:43, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi how are you.112.79.37.69 (talk) 12:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what sockpuppet investigations mean, But your sock page is deleted by someone named Mike V. Why I can't delete or create a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aceticrpose mard aurat (talk • contribs) 18:17, 12 May 2015 (UTC) You said that, :I am surprised by this accusation. I removed unsourced WP:OR from Hindu–Islamic relations. You, the accuser User:Sharif uddin, have reverted the article back to a version with the following tags,[reply]

This section possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (November 2010)

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2010)

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay that states the Wikipedia editor's particular feelings about a topic, rather than the opinions of experts. (October 2014)

etc.

Clearly, 4+ years cite request wait for WP:V sources is enough, and the tags state "unsourced materials and original research should be removed". For my edit, I left the following edit summary, "remove OR, remove personal essay, unsupported text with cite pending request for years, this article needs major overhall."

But the real statement were:

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.

This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay that states the Wikipedia editor's particular feelings about a topic, rather than the opinions of experts. (October 2014)

This article possibly contains original research. (October 2014)

This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2014)[2]

It clearly mentions that, the cites were not 4+ years but 1 year. why have you lied? Sharif uddin (talk) 21:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Aceticrpose mard aurat, Mike V deleted the "sock complaint page", not the "your sock page". Mike V is an admin, who can delete pages and complete/close/decline investigations. If you want to nominate pages for deletion, read wikipedia's WP:DELETE and WP:PG. Welcome to wikipedia.

@Sharif uddin, you have been blocked a few times, in recent months, by different wikipedia administrators for bad faith actions (for example here). Do not harass me or others with bad faith accusations of impropriety. I invite you to join me in the coming weeks as I add cites, remove OR, delete unsourced speculative information and improve the Hindu–Islamic relations article. Latifa Raafat (talk) 02:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Latifa Raafat! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! C E (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Request

Hi dear user, though we have some difference of opinion, still I appreciate your writing because you write with proper sources attached. Can you help me for finding some sources regarding article Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir? This article lacks NPOV and my sourced matter has been reverted many times. You are good in finding various reports and books. Can you help me? Thank you. --Human3015 talk • 03:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) And this article also Human rights violations in Balochistan.--C E (talk) 04:22, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jizya article edit

Hello! It seems you edited the Jizya article and you deleted my entry stating 'no need to repeat the orthodox rationale', however that article didn't originally incorporate it. Regards. --HakimPhilo (talk) 22:11, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See the article's talk page. Latifa Raafat (talk) 20:06, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying a User in talkpage

Latifa Raafat, I noticed you have tried to ping Aceticrpose mard aurat and Sharif uddin by putting @ before their usernames.

This is how you notify somebody: ping by adding {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} to your message.

As @Aceticrpose mard aurat:, or Aceticrpose mard aurat. Otherwise they won't get any notification from you.

If you post on a User:talk page, the user is already notified and you won't have to ping him or mention him. In case you know this already, Happy editing. --Cosmic Emperor 14:37, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wael B. Hallaq. Shariah: Theory, Practice and Transformations. Cambridge University Press. 2009, p. 332.

Hello may I ask where did you get this book or where to access, is it possible you can send it to me. I was confused since it seems Mr.Hallaq wrote another book in the same year of 2009, which threw me of guard when I searched him in WorldCat,I will be much obliged. RussianDewey (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added ISBN code yesterday for the Hallaq book published by Cambridge University Press. It is not a free book. Either purchase it, or visit a good library. Latifa Raafat (talk) 15:18, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand it is not a free book, i never implied it was, I was trying to exchange resources as many Wikipedians have done. I was wondering how did ou access the book? The closest library to that has the book is far away and I'm busy taking summer classes. RussianDewey (talk) 17:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]