User talk:Lashenko

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear Lashenko: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! James084 14:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic painting

Your article Dynamic painting has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Wikipedia Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and {{wikify}} them. Thanks and happy editing! James084 14:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic painting

Your article appears to be an instance of WP:COI. You appear to be the only person using this term, you give no verifiable references on the topic, and the only link is to your own personal website. Wikipedia should not be used for self-promotion. Unless you can show that "dynamic painting" is something beyond your own personal endeavors, I will recommend that this article be deleted. Cheers, Doctormatt 03:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sx577.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sx577.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in San base

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on San base, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because San base is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting San base, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Dynamic Painting, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.sanbase.com/art/technology.html. As a copyright violation, Dynamic Painting appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dynamic Painting has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Dynamic Painting and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Dynamic Painting with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Dynamic Painting.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Icestorm815 (talk) 17:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Peacock Terms

By Peacock terms, in short, it means words that give a positive bias towards an article. When writing articles at Wikipedia, we would like to try our best to have articles that have a neutral point of view. To give you an idea, here are a few examples I found in the article. "powerful computer system" - instead of claiming it is as powerful, list in detail what type of computer aspects it may have. "carefully devised "mutation" algorithm" - again, you could explain the technical aspects of the algorithm. "However, they are more than that." - This is a sentence that gives a bias towards the subject of the article. Hopefully that helps. Above all, remember that you must give reliable sources for any information that you include in the article. More information on sources can be found here. If you need more info on how to write a better article, check the page here, It will give you in plent of ways to improve your article. Hopefully that will help you out! Let me know if you have any more questions! Icestorm815 (talk) 19:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good! I think that the article seems to be better now. Next time though, you can always be bold and remove the template yourself. I did however, add the template that says there are no references on it. Don't be discouraged, all you have to do is provide one, and you can remove the template, thats all. Any more questions, you know where to reach me! Happy editing! Icestorm815 (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: San Base

Hello Lashenko. The San Base article simply did not read like a dispassionate encyclopedia article; it read like it was written by someone affiliated with the artist or a big fan. Words like "revolutionary", "breathes a life" and "whole new dimension" are what raise the red flag. If you are affiliated with the artist, you should read the guideline on conflict of interest and let someone else write the article.--Kubigula (talk) 00:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:X577.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:X577.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sx765.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sx765.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sx577.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sx577.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sx632.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sx632.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:58, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sx1165.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sx1165.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:59, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]