User talk:Larsenito

Larsenito, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Larsenito! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Your addition to Danny Rivera has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. John of Reading (talk) 10:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Feb 27 2014

Hello John of Reading, I do have permit to use the text posted on Danny Rivera. I have been part of writing it myself for his web page. The one on Wikipedia was flawed and inaccurate. I am not aware that this content is copyrighted. I will try to find out how to get some sort of a license, since it is partly from myself. Larsenito (talk) 11:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Larsenito

OK; the page you need to look at is Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online. But even then, other editors may decide that the text is not suitable for an encyclopedia article. If you are here to promote this artist, please have a look at the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Feb 27 2014

I'll look it up (have to learn this stuff). The bio-pages on the website will be CC today. I myself have been publishing CC since 2007 and also been ambassador for Creative Commons in the Nordic Countries. The bio on this artist (that I have known for years privately) is not meant as a promotional text at all. The purpose id to set the record and do away with incorrect nonsense. Activities to promote the artist's work goes on other places. The purpose is to have at least two places, where data are correct as a reference. That is why I entered Wikipedia with this.

Mar 6 2014

Hello again, the text in question are now marked Creative Commons Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License. It is not promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larsenito (talk • contribs) 23:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. I've made a note on the article talk page. If you put the text back in the article, it shouldn't be treated as a copyright violation. You may find the text is altered by other editors for other reasons, though. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)