User talk:Lars Gule

Law proposal/ blasfemi-saken

That your article about the law proposal, was notable for Norwegian wikipedia, I am convinced of.

But even with a stable English article, as interwiki, it still would have stood a strong chance of being deleted (with the current reign, of (an) informal network on wiki-norw. Beware, that even race horses attract flies).

I might attempt an article here on this wikipedia. If no one beats me to the punch.

Do you have any suggestions for English text that should be included in such an article?

Happy holidays. --Camouflage Sutra (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Professions and Professionalism

The article Professions and Professionalism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal, no independent references, not indexed in any major selective database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict-of-interest editing

Hello Lars Gule. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lars Gule, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. __meco (talk) 08:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]