User talk:Larek

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Larek! I am LouriePieterse and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Lourie Pieterse 15:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sikorsky H-5

I have reverted your move from H-5 to R-5 please start a move discussion on the talk page to gain a consensus, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 17:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Cloud Nine, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 21:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added a additional entry to a Disambig page, and you left a note on my talk page that I need to cite my sources on that edit.

As Disambig pages don't really ever have <ref> tags, what is the issue?Larek (talk) 16:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Law of Contradiction & Principle of Non-Contradiction

Hi Larek,

The Law of Contradiction (LC) is different from the Principle of Non-Contradiction (PNC). The Principle is fundamental and is not derived. The theorem or Law is derived from basic principles, which is what Russell&Whitehead did in the Principles of Mathematics (PM). See http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1465/ , for example, for the circularity that entails. There are no principles of mathematics without first assuming the PNC, so deriving it is an exercise in tautology. For this reason, I would think that the less said about the Principles of Mathematics, the less confusion is introduced into the article.

Do you disagree? BlueMist (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On the Law of Contradiction. No I don't disagree, As I didn't include the {def}. My edit was to correct the existing PM quote as a historical reference. I Then added the "Law of Contradiction" since there were already three titles (both laws and principals) and (non- and not non-), Since that is how its refereed to in PM which is just a line or two below. It just seemed how the arithmetical was already going..

As for if a PM reference is confusing.. That's up for grabs. This is an encyclopedia, so historical references are a good thing. Its a very short blurb. And Even though principals are not derived, they didn't spontaneously exist either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larek (talk • contribs) 15:44, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I guess the title of the article could be changed to Principle, and Law should then have its own paragraph. meh... BlueMist (talk) 01:53, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]