User talk:Lapratho

August 2007

New York City Fire Department

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to New York City Fire Department. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. (Diff) (Diff) Ford MF 22:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to New York City Fire Department. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Leuko 03:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to New York City Fire Department, you will be blocked from editing. Leuko 03:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY FROM lapratho:

User Leuko is not even able to receive messages, as he did not enter a valid email address. Is this another anonymous user with ill intent, trying to bully false information into this public document?

Here is my message to him:

Regarding the ongoing editing of the New York Fire Department article:

I am not inserting unsourced statements regarding 9/11. I personally listened to the 9/11 hearings, and many agree, that no serious questions were asked. The case was never cleared, hence it is absolutely appropriate to:

add to the certain statement regarding a terrorist attack and airplanes being flown into the towers the word "allegedly"

to replace the sentence "flown" with "impacted"

Please state WHERE and WHEN and by WHOM this case was truly reolved when making such firm statements.

Until such time, any description of the events is pure speculation.

Please see my reply on how your edits are vandalism on my talk page. Thanks. Leuko 03:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Leuko 04:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger 04:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]