User talk:Lance W. Haverkamp

I see you've been here a while, but since no one seems to have extended you an official Wikipedia welcome yet, let me belatedly take care of that:

Welcome!

Hello, Lance W. Haverkamp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Infrogmation June 30, 2005 01:08 (UTC)

GSWoT

Thanks for changing the link - I wasn't entirely sure if it deserved an article, or how to explain it. Alphax ^τεχ 05:22, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NORFED etc.

This is something better said here than on AfD. You recently posted as part of your "vote":

KEEP this and all other articles on the facts. Brian G. Crawford, mikka & others who go around saying people need to be "protected" from certain organizations are no better than book burners--who's next? Democrats? Christianity? the NRA? Islam? Grow up! --Lance W. Haverkamp 15:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But funnily enough you don't edit on topics concerning democracy, religion or freedom of association, do you Lance? In fact, it would appear that with very few exceptions in the 3 weeks you have been a contributing editor you only concern yourself with contributing to the Liberty Dollar article. Given your in-depth additions, link scattering, photo uploads and patronising edit summaries you might forgive me for harbouring suspicions that you are a NORFED "associate" who chooses to hide that fact... In fact, very few seem to be able to admit to being an associate when casting votes on this topic. Such editors do a great disservice to the ideals of Wikipedia, I hope you'll agree. Deiz 01:02, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. If people declared their allegiances when making / voting on AfD's the process would be more credible. Rest assured I respect expertise. The "3 weeks" was my mistake, from your user contributions I misread the date of your first contribution as Feb 06, it's Feb 05 so it's one year and 3 weeks. Deiz 10:44, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lance, please don't dlete large amounts of material without discussing the edit on the article talk page. Thanks, -Will Beback

Merging Simple Church and House Church

Please read the talk on House Church. There I disagree with your recommendation to merge "Simple Church" based on several reason I have heard talking to people within the movement. For some people, "House church" indicates only meeting place while "Simple Church" indicates a value, a big difference for many involved. Oakiebsc 23:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ProPhotoHost

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! --Vox Causa 01:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Liberty-dollars.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Liberty-dollars.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Four liberty collage.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Four liberty collage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Liberty Dollar.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Liberty Dollar.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Libertarian Party of Colorado (logo).svg

Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian Party of Colorado (logo).svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christian Universalist Association.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fascism talk page

Good afternoon, I have done some research and weighed in on the fascism talk page, I believe my research shows a blatant double standard. I would appreciate whatever viewpoint you would have in the matter. Thank you.RTShadow (talk) 21:31, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lance W. Haverkamp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is assigned by my residential ISP https://forcebb.com/, at this time it's 199.188.117.122. Lance W. Haverkamp (talk) 17:39, 21 April 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

Accept reason:

I unblocked the IP ranges, so you should be able to edit now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:08, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]