User talk:LanceUnderpants

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, LanceUnderpants. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Jytdog (talk) 02:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC) Jytdog (talk) 02:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions on pseudoscience

Just want to make sure you are aware of the following.

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Jytdog (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A warning

this kind of edit is an unacceptable WP:BLP violation. Really. Edit with care. User:Jytdog (talk) 23:22, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jytdog. Please threaten others with more care than this. Your accusations and edits of mine have just been undone by editor JzG. So please threaten him with discretionary sanctions and take up this issue with JzG. Plus please stop provoking troublesome things on this talk page. thank you in advance for your cooperation. LanceUnderpants (talk) 00:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, Guy did not restore your edit. Guy understands BLP. Jytdog (talk) 00:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions on content about living people

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

User:Jytdog (talk) 23:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gongwool. Thank you. Bri (talk) 09:38, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I see that you have been blocked and tagged as a WP:SOCK, so it's virtually impossible for you to edit this site in the near future. SportsLair (talk) 11:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NRVS (disambiguation)

The article NRVS (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page per WP:TWODABS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LittleWink (talk) 10:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]