User talk:Lampsalot

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Tiramisoo (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Hello, Lampsalot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

BOVINEBOY2008 11:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Work Smart

Greetings. Please look at WP:RS. Blogs are not reliable sources. cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 01:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

American nationalism

Hi Lampsalot, thanks for your recent edits on American nationalism. I removed the sentence about a Christian nation and founding fathers being Deists because it didn't have a source and uses words like "some" and "many" instead of being specific. I was worried that it might be an over-generalization to say all Constitutionalists oppose Dominionism, etc. But I hope you come back to the article and add it in again, this time with sources. I think it is very important that the American nationalism article cover the "civic religion" that has developed here, and I hope you don't give up on researching it! So I would encourage you to find a couple reliable sources and let's talk about it in a way that is referenced, precise and hopefully educational :) Thanks,

-- Joren (talk) 04:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Communal anarchy

I have nominated Communal anarchy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communal anarchy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:People with Aspergers

Category:People with Aspergers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 02:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inapropriate categories to articles

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to David Byrne and Albert Einstein twice each ([1], [2], [3], [4]), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 19:26, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scene

Hi. I have redirected Scene (fashion), which you created, to 2000–2009 in fashion. Previous articles on "scene", "scene fashion", "scene kids", etc. have been deleted and/or redirected nearly a dozen times because the topic does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria, namely having received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources with a history of fact-checking and accuracy. Blogs and fansites like "ilovescene.com" and "scenegirls.org" fail this criteria. For more information, please read WP:SOURCES and WP:RS. You can also see some of the previous deletion discussions at the following links:

As you can see, "scene" as a topic for Wikipedia has been roundly rejected a number of times due to insufficient sources existing. Before creating yet another "scene" article, please try gathering sources that meet the criteria of WP:RS, making a draft in userspace, and submitting it to Wikipedia:Articles for creation for review first. --IllaZilla (talk) 04:48, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Tiramisoo (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 08:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zero world government for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zero world government is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero world government until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grnrchst (talk) 20:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zero world government for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zero world government is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero world government (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grnrchst (talk) 14:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]