User talk:Lamg123

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Philippe Cousteau Jr. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 04:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 04:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned for edit warring per the result of this complaint. You may be blocked if you try to add your material to the Philippe Cousteau Jr. article again before getting consensus in your favor on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lamg123

Hi, I'm Kevin, a clerk at Sockpuppet Investigations (SPI). To resolve a pending investigation involving you, you are advised that abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; any unauthorized use, directly or indirectly (through a friend or colleague) is grounds for a block from Wikipedia; and you are strongly warned that your editing patterns may suggest abuse of multiple accounts. You are further reminded to follow all Wikipedia policies, including those on conflicts of interest and edit warring. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 02:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lamg123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]