User talk:Lame wiki amigos
NEW:
Lame wiki amigos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My point exacly. I just left this for Admin to read and there Hersfold was quick to undo it. Wow, lame. Anyways...You guys aren't understanding still, never mind. This isn't worth the hassle, I don't need this user name. I can create another one, I was just telling you what the deal was. You're not paying attention to the fact that a shared computer meant that if I had not logged out, I was at risk for someone else making bad edits. That is in fact what happened at that time which is why threats and such were left. As I tried to explain, that individual will not be doing that anymore as he doesn't have access to the computer/network anymore. But now you have punished innocent users with different accounts on the same IP such as Jon_the_editor who didn't do anything wrong or who just didn't sign a comment left, etc. etc. That sort of thing. But defending myself to you all is useless, I don't have to and I don't want to. This is petty. Useless. Worthless. Not a big deal in my life. May be all you have going for you, but I have much more than WIKI on my mind. I regret I wasted time even trying to make things right when dealing with stubborn individuals. Sometimes you have to give the benefit of the doubt as an admin and not be so quick to judge/assume. That may upset you, but that's the truth. I won't make another account simply because I don't like how this process works. It's very unfair and bias regardless of what the rules say. Admin are very "clicky" and you can't delete user profiles which I wish this one was. It was just an unproductive use of time. I won't come back to read your reply, I'm sure it will be nasty/negative as usual. One last thing, consider this: Admin may actually be wrong and not perfect either. You have to take feelings/emotions out of this process. Goodbye! Lame wiki amigos (talk) 20:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
User not requesting unblock. Just leave a regular comment next time. lifebaka++ 21:11, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I think you guys push people to the point of anger so you have the WIKI all to yourself. Have it. LOL Not a big deal, geesh. I have a life. Lame wiki amigos (talk) 20:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Lame wiki amigos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Thank you for your assistance. But that is what I'm trying to explain, we share the same IP but have different accounts we use. And the person who put the block on Jon_the_editor, didn't/doesn't allow him to send an unblock request like I can which he should be able to dispute under the circumstances. He is not at fault. He is unable to make an edit on his user page for some reason and should be able to but that is why I'm doing so for him since we are at the same "location"/IP. Again, he only commented on my talk page to explain my unblock request better (stating WIKI could even "follow" me to make sure I'm a man of my word about not making disruptive edits anymore), but he shouldn't be blocked for his assistance. And he can't even request it since he is unable to edit his page, only I'm able to do so like this. The problem lies with when we make an edit on the computer, the edit page sometimes "bounces up and down" while we type for some reason and apparently his message overlapped with mine and didn't register a signature which made the administrator think we were one person using multiple accounts when his comment was supposed to be separate but the dang cursor skips all around and is hard to keep it in order making some words out of order. It's frustrating. I end up having to type it on another program then copying/pasting it in here so it works. I hope you know what I'm trying to say, this is very exhausting, if you ever had your cursor (keyboard strokes) move around and the page bounce up and down. That's the only way I can explain it. But I'm getting off the topic. He was blocked in error, he used the same IP and sometimes the computer is shared, but we have our own account. The person that didn't approve my unblock request claimed we had multiple accounts, but we have our own. He has his and I have mine. He just didn't sign his edit regarding the unblock request on my page which was his only mistake. I'm repeating myself because it seems so difficult to explain how this is all a big misunderstanding. You have no risk to allow us access, we will be blocked if we do make bad edits, which he never really did. What I wanted to explain is that I would still use mine again if I'm allowed back on to make good edits from here on out, but if I wasn't allowed access again, I at least wanted to explain that Jon_the_editor (who can't defend himself without access to edit for some reason) shouldn't be blocked and he can't make a request to unblock himself on his page. I hope this is understandable, I really have no idea how to explain it better/easier. At this point I will just give up since it's apparent it's not working, which would be regretfully unfortunate. It's become more complicated than it is and we are both agreeing to make good/clean/beneficial/legit edits from here on out and it's all just a misunderstanding regarding the wireless Internet connection I'm sure. If you read these over and over, I think it will become apparent what I'm trying to say. I know it all runs together and can be confusing but it's really not hard to understand, I just may not be explaining it in "type" the best way. Your help is appreciated. Thank you again.
Decline reason:
Inappropriate behaviour from this account - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALame_wiki_amigos&diff=257624242&oldid=256979258 - is not a misunderstanding or a result of your shared IP. Legal threats and death threats are not permitted here. --B (talk) 18:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
OLD:
Lame wiki amigos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please discontinue block. User problems are resolved. Vandalism won't be committed using this user name. Simple errors only with ISP access. Will change user name if needed. Thank you.
Decline reason:
Not a chance, considering that you used an alternate account to edit this very page. But thanks for exposing yourself. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lame wiki amigos (talk) 09:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Lame wiki amigos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please see explanation below. Same as original request. Explained user access of shared computer and new user or unused. Clarity on previous request. Mistake made with edit. Not being mischievous nor sneaky with "multiple users". Thank you.
Decline reason:
I'm not sure I follow your explanation fully but I believe you are trying to say that this account is for whoever accesses Wikipedia from a particular place, not under the control of the user who originally registered it. In that case, request denied. No account is required to edit Wikipedia, and only your default IP address can be used for this purpose: registered accounts may never be shared under any circumstances. Mangojuicetalk 05:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lame wiki amigos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't know how else to explain it with as much that I wrote. It may have been confusing and for that I apologize. I'm asking for an unblock of Jon_the_editor at least who suggested I create an account originally but I later caused the problems. I will not be using this anymore since there is no trust that I'll make good edits and it can stay unblocked. But the IP for Jon_the_editor is the same as this one. It's not Jon_the_editor's fault. He just didn't sign his edit regarding unblocking this but knows me and the last person to deny the block assumed we were violating the "multiple user/account" rule. We/I am not. He will not via Jon_the_editor. He makes good edits and shouldn't be punished. No one logged under one an others account, but User:Jpgordon blocked Jon_the_editor since he made an additional comment about unblocking this after my comment and he didn't sign it. It was also merged with my comment due to compute error mistake perhaps. He did so since he knew the situation and I'm not going to be editing anymore if it's an issue. He was just trying to help prevent me from staying blocked if I promised to make good edits with this IP and computer. We don't share accounts/users. Not sure how else to explain it. The only risk you have, is if Jon_the_editor makes disruptive edits which he hasn't done, you can just block him then. Not because we both share an IP. We don't share accounts. Just IP. He is unable to edit and request an unblock on his user page, even though the policy is that he is supposed to be able to dispute it which is why I am here since I am able to edit and request an unblock request. If anything, I'd think this one wouldn't allow me to edit an unblock request. This is allot of work when we want to just help. We have no other incentive or gain. We don't get paid, we just try to make it a reliable Internet source. We could create new profiles and move on with good edits, but I'm trying to explain the situation and redeem our status. At least his for being wrongfully blocked when he was only trying to help and explain and it "appeared" we shared accounts. We only share same wireless Internet. I hope you have understanding and mercy under the circumstances. Trust you will use your administration ability for good as he wants to do so as well. Thank you. P.S. You can see by his input prior to his block that he was adding info about my account and was wrongfully blocked.
Decline reason:
I apologize for my earlier misunderstanding. If you will not be using this account any more, then there is no reason to unblock it. As for Jon the editor's block, since you maintain that you are different people, it is up to him to request unblocking on his own behalf. Mangojuicetalk 15:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lame wiki amigos (talk) 07:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason: "Not a chance, considering that you used an alternate account to edit this very page. But thanks for exposing yourself. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC)"
Regarding above, neither Lame_wiki_amigos nor Jon_the_editor used an alternate account to edit the page. We share the same IP but our accounts are different. We are different people. He just didn't sign his remark in error and added it to mine. So it looked like it was the same individual. But we both know that there is a record left of all edits, we aren't that foolish to leave evidence like that if that was the case. Which it is not, he was wrongfully blocked. My mistakes were from long before and I won't be make bad edits anymore. There isn't anything we/he was trying to do to violate wiki rules. Sorry for all the trouble. Your assitance is appreciated greatl. Have a great day. Lame wiki amigos (talk) 09:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
P.S. I received this message (as has been the case for us before) when I tried to leave my unblock request (this is the way it reads, I didn't type it this way.): "Sorry! We could not process your edit due to a loss of session data. Please try again. If it still does not work, try logging out and logging back in."
Forgot previous signature. Oops, sorry. Lame wiki amigos (talk) 15:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
In addition, our/mine account is not associated with: sock puppet of Nigh8 and it never was. That may have been an old user/account from way back when off the same IP but I assure you we are different people using a shared wireless connection I'm sure. Hence why we want our account access back so there is no mistake in who is making what edits. I appreciate your grace concerning this matter. Have a great day! Lame wiki amigos (talk) 16:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- "We" (as well as the username itself) implies that this account is being used by more than one person, a violation of our rules. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Jon the editor
[edit]I've tweaked Jon the editor's block. I believe it was already set so as to allow him to post an unblock request but just in case I've reissued the block with correct settings. If he wants to be unblocked it is time for him to make the request under his own user talk page. (Please tell him to edit User talk:Jon the editor, and if that fails, to send email to the blocking admin.) Mangojuicetalk 17:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)