User talk:Lambodharan
Talk:Ezhava
[edit]Ok, I'm giving you fair warning. Weeks ago, you posted basically a "Ezhavas are not Dalits" argument, I asked everyone for sources and you haven't responded. I have no problem about putting the language in but don't come complaining that you want the language changed without a source. Other people went through the effort to prove their arguments so it's only fair. I also hope you saw my response about use of folklore. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
You are bigot.Understand that Syrian christians are not related community to nair,nambiar and ezhava/chovva/thiya.you want to spread wrong informations.infact Nairs and nambiars cannot trace their proper lineage and many bastard children of namboodiris are in central kerala and south kerala.please learn that nairs are considered asudham by early syrian christians.moreover ,early syrian christians are more of hindus with Jesus as the main god with many hindu gods.later in 12th century along with they are corrected by the west asian bishops from orthodox and roman catholic churches.I know for a fact that Nairs in south kerala ,many of them are negro black and they are supposedly assimilated from some tribal communities to nair caste by travancore kings.sudras must remain sudras. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.0.245 (talk) 07:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)