User talk:Lamacha9617

This is Lamacha9617's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lin Chambers (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need to see WP:SIGCOV of the subject, not just coverage of the projects they have been involved with. This person currently doesn't meet WP:NPROF so they will need to pass WP:GNG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lin Chambers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lin Chambers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:13, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lamacha9617! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 01:13, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lin Chambers has been accepted

Lin Chambers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lamacha9617

Thank you for creating Lin Chambers.

User:Sulfurboy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Accepted and reviewed. Congrats on your first article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sulfurboy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sulfurboy: Woohoo, thank you! Lamacha9617 (talk) 03:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lamacha9617, I hope the contention in no way discourages from further contributing. Please message me on my talk page if you need help with anything. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandra Caldwell (actress) (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more lead roles in major films. The Disclosure one she is among a very large ensemble cast.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandra Caldwell (actress) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sandra Caldwell (actress), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Padlet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Padlet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to see you having to deal with this. Seems some people think it's OK to try to delete a person's work just because it relates to a business. I failed and gave up, and I appreciate you building a new page. If I can help let me know.Oblivy (talk) 05:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Oblivy! I had seen that you had written a page that got deleted, so I'm hoping that we can avoid a repeat of that this time around. Seems like a pretty straightforward overreach of admin powers. Thanks for your support! Lamacha9617 (talk)

Hi. I see you moved the page out of draft space without getting a review. That's not advisable and the result was that it got tagged for deletion. It's now at Draft:Padlet for you to work on. Deb (talk) 15:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deb - I'm a bit confused. I closely read Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft before moving this article to mainspace and it says: "Once you feel the draft is completed, you may wish to ask for feedback on your creation first at Wikipedia:Peer review. If you are ready to go live, you can move it to mainspace." This seems to say that autoconfirmed users do not have to go through the peer review/AfC process before moving a draft to article space. If that is not true, then perhaps that page should be changed to be clearer. Do you have any comments on the content of the Padlet page that would deem it inappropriate to live in article space, or is your concern solely with the method of publishing? Lamacha9617 (talk)

Hi. A user only needs ten edits to be autoconfirmed, which is practically nothing, and new users are always advised to practise with small edits before trying to create a new article. It seems like you created this in your sandbox instead of at AfC, which had used previously, but you have fewer than 100 edits altogether, which is very few. Had you had more experience, the fact that an article on Padlet had been previously deleted would have rung alarm bells. So yes, you can move it to article space without review - you have the ability to do so - but that doesn't make it a sensible thing for an inexperienced user to do. Frankly, I'm not even convinced that Padlet meets the notability criteria, which is why I'm not deleting it as advertising but am leaving it to you to submit it for review to uninvolved contributors if you so wish. If you don't want to, by all means move it back into article space yourself and see how things pan out. Deb (talk) 18:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to elaborate on this. Though it's a bit frustrating that edit count is used so heavily as a proxy for quality, it's helpful to know that's the way the cookie crumbles. The case for notability seems pretty clear to me, but I'll submit for peer review and see what happens. Lamacha9617 (talk) 19:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Lamacha9617! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:25, Saturday, December 5, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Orphaned non-free image File:Padlet Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Padlet Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata duplicate

I see you created Q103832703 (which is a duplicate entry of Q102253002 for Peter Atherton). I recommend they be merged but don’t know how. Thanks in advance Adin-Atherton (talk) 14:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adin-Atherton - Huh. I'm afraid I'm not sure how to merge entries on Wikidata either. I see there is a proposed help page on the topic but I'm a bit intimidated by the process. I didn't make Q103832703, I was just the most recent person to edit it - it looks like the duplicate entry was originally created by Pi bot which is run by Mike Peel - maybe they can help with the duplicate? Lamacha9617 (talk) 15:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Adin-Atherton and Lamacha9617: Thanks for spotting the duplicates - I've merged them into Col. Peter Atherton (Q102253002). If you come across this again, I suggest turning on the 'Merge' gadget in your Wikidata preferences. It's quick and easy to use that, and it will let you know if it spots any issues before trying to do the merge. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:43, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Good to know Mike Adin-Atherton (talk) 16:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Laura Chambers

Hello, Lamacha9617. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Laura Chambers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Padlet has been accepted

Padlet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Barkeep49 (talk) 15:12, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordan Mackampa has been accepted

Jordan Mackampa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 02:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Writer's Barnstar
		Great job creating Circe, widely read and definitely deserving of an article! Thanks for your excellent work.--MattMauler (talk) 12:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Woohoo, my first barnstar! Thank you so much! Lamacha9617 (talk) 15:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Center on Privacy and Technology

Hello, Lamacha9617. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Center on Privacy and Technology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Indigenous History Month

Hello, Lamacha9617. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indigenous History Month, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Timothy Dwight College

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Timothy Dwight College indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Indigenous History Month

Hello, Lamacha9617. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indigenous History Month".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:24, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Laura Chambers

Hello, Lamacha9617. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laura Chambers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jennah Bell moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jennah Bell, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Praxidicae - thank you for this message. As I just published the article under an hour ago, I am still actively editting and in the process of adding more sources. Is there a way I can signal this in the future to prevent articles from being moved to draftspace prematurely? Lamacha9617 (talk) 19:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You could work on it and source it while it's in draft space before moving it to article space. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films banned in Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jennah Bell

Hello, Lamacha9617. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jennah Bell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jennah Bell

Hello, Lamacha9617. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jennah Bell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited One-drop rule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PadletLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PadletLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PadletLogo2024.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PadletLogo2024.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]