User talk:Laln93

Welcome!

Hello, Laln93, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Dэя-Бøяg 01:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles about Uruguayan Primera Division

(in English) Hi and welcome. Don't worry about your good work. Technical mistakes happens on Wikipedia. Anyway, the older existant articles are favoured as titles also because it seems a standard title also linked on the {{Primera División Uruguaya seasons}}. Regarding the content, usage of {{merge to}} means that the content you added will not be lost, but integrated into the existant article, as standard. By the way, I have seen that the recent seasons of Uruguayan 1era Div. (from 2007) are named with "season". But I don't know the reason of this recent change. In this cases could be useful a general discussion in the related WikiProject to choose a standard title with or without "season" or to explain why from 2007 the articles are named "season" (but this is out of my -poor- knowledge about the Uruguayan 1era Div.). Good work and regards and... don't worry, my English is far away to be perfect... And my Spanish too. :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 01:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(in Spanish) Hola y bienvenido. No te preocupes por tu buen trabajo. Errores técnicos sucede sobre Wikipedia. Entonces... Es preferible el título de los antiguos artículo, que parecean standard que tienes un link por el {{Primera División Uruguaya seasons}}. En cuanto al contenido, el uso de {{merge to}} significa que el contenido de tu artículos no se perderá, pero será integrado en el artículo más viejo (por standard). Todo modo, yo he visto que los últimos artículos de la 1era División. (desde 2007) son nombrados con "season". Pero yo no sé la razón de este cambio reciente. En estos casos podría ser útil un debate general en el WikiProjecto relacionado por elegir un título standard con o sin "season" o para explicar por qué a partir de 2007 los artículos se denominan "season" (pero esto está un poquito fuera de mi -pobre- conocimiento sobre la Primera División Uruguaya). Saludos y buen trabajo y... no te preocupes, tambien mi Inglés es muy imperfecto... y tu disculpame por mi español. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Ok, you can merge if you wish. Of course, Wikipedia has no article owners :-) ... Anyway I may watch and fix (if necessary), if I'm still awake. Regarding the league table, take care of a thing: "Equipo - PJ - PG - PE - PP - GF - GC - DG - PTS" are in Spanish. In English, as for the other tables into existant articles, the correspondant acronyms are: "Club - P - W - D - L - GF - GA - GD - PTS". The parameter "GD" ("DG" in Spanish) is not present into the correspondant old articles. Good work and... ah, about the standard title ("season" or not, or why "season" from 2007), is better to wait. I think answers will arrive. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:09, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well...

Done :-) with the merging of articles. I've controlled and made some technical fixes (replacing template and category and adding RSSSF website link under its original section "references" -even if it isn't an "inline" citation, it's a standard and valid reference for other "Primera División" articles-). Only a thing: be careful leaving old content (as templates and categories or RSSSF link in "references" with the original form Uruguay - List of final tables (RSSSF)) in case of further edits. By the way... Ok, it was a good collaborative "super fix". Regards and good work. PS: never mind, distracitons happens :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 03:40, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1901 Uruguayan Primera División (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Juan Pena

1903 Uruguayan Primera División (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Juan Pena

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Deadbeef. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Talk:List of football stadiums in Uruguay, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dea db eef 20:10, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How to move a page

Hi again :-) . Well, I've seen your contribs on Uruguayan Football Stadiums, adding some markup fixes to the tables and other minor corrections. For example, with your contribs the article is now a list that follows different criteria (list by division and by capacity), no more a "simple-single" list. Good work. Anyway, after the fixes, I've redirected it again to List of football stadiums in Uruguay (of course the content you added has been saved over there). I've done this edit because the correct way to change a title to an article is not to create a new title and redirecting the older one to it. Due to the fact that List of football stadiums in Uruguay has an older and longer chronology and was created in 2009, the correct form is to request a move adding in the talk the template {{Requested move}}. As you can see, I've added the request here, in the way to help you to attempt to move the title in the proper technical way. So you can vote there to move the title. By the way, I've now voted "oppose" to move because I have seen that the articles in the Category:Lists of association football stadiums are all titled in the form List of football stadiums in xxx. Anyway, I'll follow the developments of requested move and maybe change my idea. Good work and regards :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 15:44, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uruguayan Primera División, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jorge da Silva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liga Uruguaya de Basketball, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mercedes, Maldonado and Salto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message! --Laln93 (talk) 17:26, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Riodike Fútbol Club

The article Riodike Fútbol Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-professional team.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fixertool (talk) 23:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TV Total (Uruguay)

The article TV Total (Uruguay) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable online TV channel without coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Raymie (t • c) 18:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Velocidad Total

The article Velocidad Total has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, like its parent TV channel. Website is dead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Raymie (t • c) 23:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]